From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
To: Minas Harutyunyan <Minas.Harutyunyan@synopsys.com>Minas
Harutyunyan <Minas.Harutyunyan@synopsys.com>,
Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Cc: "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [v2] usb: dwc3: Prevent indefinite sleep in _dwc3_set_mode during suspend/resume
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 10:54:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d100qwc5.fsf@linux.intel.com> (raw)
Hi,
Minas Harutyunyan <Minas.Harutyunyan@synopsys.com> writes:
>>>>>> Thanks for picking this for -next.
>>>>>> Is it better to have this in v4.16-rc fixes?
>>>>>> and also stable? v4.12+
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, there was no "Fixes: foobar" or "Cc: stable" lines in the commit
>>>>> log ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> The best we can do now, is wait for -rc1 and manually send the commit to
>>>>> stable.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That's fine. Thanks.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Same issue seen in dwc3_gadget_ep_dequeue() function where also used
>>> wait_event_lock_irq() - as result infinite loop.
>>
>> how did this happen? During rmmod dwc3? Or, perhaps, after you unloaded
>> a gadget driver?
>>
> No, not during rmmod's.
> We using our internal USB testing tool. Test case; ISOC OUT, transfer
> size N frames. When host starts ISOC OUT traffic then the dwc3 based on
> "Transfer not ready" event in frame F starts transfers staring from
> frame F+4 (for bInterval=1) as result 4 requests, which already queued
> on device side, remain incomplete. Function driver on some timeout
> trying dequeue these 4 requests (without disabling EP) to complete test.
> For IN ISOC's these requests completed on MISSED ISOC event, but for
> ISOC OUT required call dequeue on some timeout.
okay
>>> Actually to fix this issue I updated condition of wait function
>>> from:
>>> !(dep->flags & DWC3_EP_END_TRANSFER_PENDING)
>>> to:
>>> !(dep->flags & DWC3_EP_END_TRANSFER_PENDING & DWC3_EP_ENABLED)
>>
>> you're not fixing anything. You're, essentially, removing the entire
>> end transfer pending logic.
> yes, you are right, but how to overcome this infinite loop? Replace
> wait_event_lock_irq() by wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq_timeout()?
The best way here would be to figure why we're missing command complete
IRQ in those cases. According to documentation, we *should* receive that
interrupt, so why is it missing?
next reply other threads:[~2018-03-19 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-19 8:54 Felipe Balbi [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-04-10 7:31 [v2] usb: dwc3: Prevent indefinite sleep in _dwc3_set_mode during suspend/resume Felipe Balbi
2018-04-10 6:29 Minas Harutyunyan
2018-03-19 13:53 Minas Harutyunyan
2018-03-19 11:36 Minas Harutyunyan
2018-03-17 6:33 Minas Harutyunyan
2018-03-16 12:25 Felipe Balbi
2018-03-16 11:43 Minas Harutyunyan
2018-03-16 11:03 Roger Quadros
2018-03-16 11:00 Felipe Balbi
2018-03-16 10:34 Roger Quadros
2018-03-09 12:47 Roger Quadros
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87d100qwc5.fsf@linux.intel.com \
--to=balbi@kernel.org \
--cc=Minas.Harutyunyan@synopsys.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).