From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: usb: dwc3: of-simple: fix use-after-free on remove
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 11:15:41 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h8m0zf0y.fsf@linux.intel.com> (raw)
Hi,
Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 12:39:18PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> writes:
>
>> > I'm still trying to get my head around this.
>> >
>> > in probe() we do
>> > {
>> > enable all clocks;
>> > pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
>> > pm_runtime_enable(dev);
>> > pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
>> > }
>> >
>> > How will runtime suspend work at all?
>> > We're holding a positive RPM count in probe().
>>
>> echo auto > /path/to/dwc3/power/control
>
> That makes no difference, user space cannot modify the always-active
> behaviour given that probe returns with a positive usage count.
>
>> Granted, that get_sync() would've been better as a pm_runtime_forbid()
>
> Yeah, that would allow user space some control, albeit in a way that
> may override a user space configuration (as the platform device would
> already have been registered).
>
> Why are you trying to prevent runtime pm in the first place? Shouldn't
> the device be allowed to suspend when it has no active child by
> default?
I don't use this glue layer, actually. As long as there are no
regressions, you can change it to your heart's content. I still it's
best to start with pm runtime blocked and let userspace decide what and
when should have pm runtime enabled.
next reply other threads:[~2018-06-18 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-18 8:15 Felipe Balbi [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-06-21 15:15 usb: dwc3: of-simple: fix use-after-free on remove Alan Stern
2018-06-21 10:11 Johan Hovold
2018-06-21 9:52 Johan Hovold
2018-06-21 8:27 Johan Hovold
2018-06-21 8:17 Roger Quadros
2018-06-20 22:55 Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-06-20 22:32 Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-06-20 15:46 Johan Hovold
2018-06-20 12:54 Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-06-20 12:23 Johan Hovold
2018-06-20 12:17 Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-06-20 11:05 Felipe Balbi
2018-06-20 9:54 Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-06-20 9:27 Felipe Balbi
2018-06-20 9:16 Tony Lindgren
2018-06-20 4:34 Tony Lindgren
2018-06-19 12:10 Tero Kristo
2018-06-19 8:18 Felipe Balbi
2018-06-18 14:32 Roger Quadros
2018-06-18 12:21 Felipe Balbi
2018-06-18 11:11 Roger Quadros
2018-06-18 9:51 Felipe Balbi
2018-06-18 9:47 Johan Hovold
2018-06-18 9:33 Felipe Balbi
2018-06-18 8:34 Johan Hovold
2018-06-13 10:59 Johan Hovold
2018-06-13 9:39 Felipe Balbi
2018-06-13 8:34 Roger Quadros
2018-06-13 8:05 Felipe Balbi
2018-06-13 7:49 Roger Quadros
2018-05-31 14:58 Johan Hovold
2018-05-31 14:45 Johan Hovold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h8m0zf0y.fsf@linux.intel.com \
--to=balbi@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rogerq@ti.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).