From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
To: Jonathan Thibault <jonathan@navigue.com>, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: USB_DWC3_OF_SIMPLE
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 10:56:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k15t6qt6.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f07f375c-9096-c94b-f457-42d4e83093c3@navigue.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2748 bytes --]
Hi,
Jonathan Thibault <jonathan@navigue.com> writes:
>>> I am currently trying to port OpenWRT to Ubiquiti's EdgeRouter 4 which
>>> is a Cavium Octeon 7130. While investigating to support XHCI (the
>>> device has a single USB3 port), I ran into the dwc3 driver which
>>> apparently supports that very chipset via the dwc3-of-simple glue.
>>>
>>> Looking at Ubiquiti's own firmware, it seems they are using a modified
>>> version of the standard xhci-platform driver.
>>>
>>> So now I am faced with two different approaches:
>>>
>>> 1- Attempt to replicate Ubiquiti's modifications to xhci-plat.
>>>
>>> 2- Switch to dwc3-of-simple.
>>>
>>> With option 1, so far, I can get xhci to load by merely adding a
>>> '.compatible =' member to usb_xhci_of_match[], but the driver complains
>>> about LPM algorithms and disables LPM (which may be fine, I don't know
>>> if it is even supported on this device).
>>>
>>> Option 2 (where you might hopefully help), potentially involves more
>>> modification to the OpenWRT since their Octeon kernel config does not
>>> appear to enable CONFIG_COMMON_CLK, which the driver depends on. And I
>>> do not know if I should also disable standard ohci and ehci drivers once
>>> I manage to enable the USB_DWC3_OF_SIMPLE.
>>>
>>> I'm looking for recommendations on the best approach. Keep in mind that
>>> while I can cobble together some ugly but functional hacks, I am not an
>>> experienced kernel dev.
>> Just switch to dwc3-of-simple, it already supports the SoC you're
>> dealing with. Try removing the dependency on CONFIG_COMMON_CLK. I think
>> we already get empty stubs when common clk is disabled.
>>
>> If that works for you, that's an easy patch.
>>
>
> Sadly, while it does build without the COMMON_CLK dependency, probing fails:
>
> [ 4.881646] dwc3 1680000000000.xhci: Configuration mismatch. dr_mode
> forced to host
> [ 4.889574] dwc3 1690000000000.xhci: Configuration mismatch. dr_mode
> forced to host
> [ 4.897546] dwc3-of-simple: probe of 1180068000000.uctl failed with
> error -12
> [ 4.904715] dwc3-of-simple: probe of 1180069000000.uctl failed with
> error -12
>
> The return value suggests that it's from the if(!simple->clks) check in
> dwc3_of_simple_clk_init().
Add a check for your platform and ignore clocks altogether.
if (of_platform_is_compatible(....)) {
ignore_clocks = true;
> The configuration mismatch warning is a bit of a mystery to me as well
> since the only mode available in kernel config is USB_DWC3_HOST and what
> I selected. Would this be because the controller itself is reporting
> another configuration?
What do you have in your Device Tree?
--
balbi
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-15 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-08 16:19 USB_DWC3_OF_SIMPLE Jonathan Thibault
2020-01-09 9:02 ` USB_DWC3_OF_SIMPLE Felipe Balbi
2020-01-09 15:27 ` USB_DWC3_OF_SIMPLE Jonathan Thibault
2020-01-15 8:56 ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87k15t6qt6.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=balbi@kernel.org \
--cc=jonathan@navigue.com \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).