linux-usb.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
To: Manu Gautam <mgautam@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"open list:DESIGNWARE USB3 DRD IP DRIVER"
	<linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: usb: dwc3: gadget: Fail request submission if it was already queued
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 11:21:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k1jbo8hm.fsf@linux.intel.com> (raw)

Hi,

Manu Gautam <mgautam@codeaurora.org> writes:
>> Manu Gautam <mgautam@codeaurora.org> writes:
>>> If a function driver tries to re-submit an already queued request,
>>> it can results in corruption of pending/started request lists.
>>> Catch such conditions and fail the request submission to DCD.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Manu Gautam <mgautam@codeaurora.org>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c | 6 ++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
>>> index 679c12e14522..51716c6b286a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
>>> @@ -1290,6 +1290,12 @@ static int __dwc3_gadget_ep_queue(struct dwc3_ep *dep, struct dwc3_request *req)
>>>  				&req->request, req->dep->name))
>>>  		return -EINVAL;
>>>  
>>> +	if (req->request.status == -EINPROGRESS) {
>> this test is really not enough. What if gadget driver set status to
>> EINPROGRESS before submission? A better check would involve making sure
>> req isn't part of dep->pending_list or dep->started_list or
>> dep->cancelled_list. It's clear that this won't work very well as the
>> amount of requests grow.
>
> Thanks for quick review.
> 'request.status' check can be replaced:
> +if (!list_empty(&req->list) {
>
> And replace list_del with list_del_init from dwc3_gadget_giveback()

I would rather avoid this. We could start tracking our own internal
dwc3_request status. Something along the lines of:

With this, we can remove some of the other request flags, such as "started".

>> Anyway, which gadget driver did this? Why is it only affecting dwc3?
>
> Function driver is not in upstream (f_mtp.c).

So this could happen with any UDC, right? Why is f_mtp.c queueing the
same request twice?

diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h
index df876418cb78..5c3ee741541f 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h
+++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h
@@ -863,6 +863,7 @@ struct dwc3_hwparams {
  * @num_pending_sgs: counter to pending sgs
  * @num_queued_sgs: counter to the number of sgs which already got queued
  * @remaining: amount of data remaining
+ * @status: internal dwc3 request status tracking
  * @epnum: endpoint number to which this request refers
  * @trb: pointer to struct dwc3_trb
  * @trb_dma: DMA address of @trb
@@ -883,6 +884,14 @@ struct dwc3_request {
 	unsigned		num_pending_sgs;
 	unsigned int		num_queued_sgs;
 	unsigned		remaining;
+
+	unsigned int		status;
+#define DWC3_REQUEST_STATUS_QUEUED	0
+#define DWC3_REQUEST_STATUS_STARTED	1
+#define DWC3_REQUEST_STATUS_CANCELLED	2
+#define DWC3_REQUEST_STATUS_COMPLETED	3
+#define DWC3_REQUEST_STATUS_UNKNOWN	-1
+
 	u8			epnum;
 	struct dwc3_trb		*trb;
 	dma_addr_t		trb_dma;
diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
index 07bd31bb2f8a..74db274786bc 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
@@ -208,6 +208,7 @@ void dwc3_gadget_giveback(struct dwc3_ep *dep, struct dwc3_request *req,
 	struct dwc3			*dwc = dep->dwc;
 
 	dwc3_gadget_del_and_unmap_request(dep, req, status);
+	req->status = DWC3_REQUEST_STATUS_COMPLETED;
 
 	spin_unlock(&dwc->lock);
 	usb_gadget_giveback_request(&dep->endpoint, &req->request);
@@ -846,6 +847,7 @@ static struct usb_request *dwc3_gadget_ep_alloc_request(struct usb_ep *ep,
 	req->direction	= dep->direction;
 	req->epnum	= dep->number;
 	req->dep	= dep;
+	req->status	= DWC3_REQUEST_STATUS_UNKNOWN;
 
 	trace_dwc3_alloc_request(req);
 
@@ -1434,6 +1436,11 @@ static int __dwc3_gadget_ep_queue(struct dwc3_ep *dep, struct dwc3_request *req)
 				&req->request, req->dep->name))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	if (WARN(req->status < DWC3_REQUEST_STATUS_COMPLETED,
+				"%s: request %pK already in flight\n",
+				dep->name, &req->request))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	pm_runtime_get(dwc->dev);
 
 	req->request.actual	= 0;
@@ -1442,6 +1449,7 @@ static int __dwc3_gadget_ep_queue(struct dwc3_ep *dep, struct dwc3_request *req)
 	trace_dwc3_ep_queue(req);
 
 	list_add_tail(&req->list, &dep->pending_list);
+	req->status = DWC3_REQUEST_STATUS_QUEUED;
 
 	/*
 	 * NOTICE: Isochronous endpoints should NEVER be prestarted. We must
diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.h b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.h
index 023a473648eb..6aebe8c0eae1 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.h
+++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.h
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ static inline void dwc3_gadget_move_started_request(struct dwc3_request *req)
 	struct dwc3_ep		*dep = req->dep;
 
 	req->started = true;
+	req->status = DWC3_REQUEST_STATUS_STARTED;
 	list_move_tail(&req->list, &dep->started_list);
 }
 
@@ -91,6 +92,7 @@ static inline void dwc3_gadget_move_cancelled_request(struct dwc3_request *req)
 	struct dwc3_ep		*dep = req->dep;
 
 	req->started = false;
+	req->status = DWC3_REQUEST_STATUS_CANCELLED;
 	list_move_tail(&req->list, &dep->cancelled_list);
 }
 

             reply	other threads:[~2019-01-11  9:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-11  9:21 Felipe Balbi [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-01-16  4:34 usb: dwc3: gadget: Fail request submission if it was already queued Manu Gautam
2019-01-11  8:24 Manu Gautam
2019-01-11  7:43 Felipe Balbi
2019-01-11  6:02 Manu Gautam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87k1jbo8hm.fsf@linux.intel.com \
    --to=balbi@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgautam@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).