From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
To: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>,
Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"linux-usb\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: John Youn <John.Youn@synopsys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: gadget: Remove incomplete check
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2020 11:03:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v9mn37vb.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a2504a3-6a89-39f2-3a9c-9ee933903d8e@synopsys.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1638 bytes --]
Hi,
Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com> writes:
>> One thing I don't get from your patch is why you're completely removing
>> the function and why isn't req->direction and actual == length not
>> needed anymore. Could you explain?
>
> It's because there's no use for that function outside of checking for
> number of pending SGs and resume.
wait, huh? What about cases when user unplugs cable midtransfer? We have
versions of dwc3 HW which fail to produce disconnect interrupt, right?
>> @@ -2491,6 +2492,16 @@ static bool dwc3_gadget_ep_request_completed(struct dwc3_request *req)
>> if (!req->direction)
>> return true;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * If there are pending scatterlist entries, we should
>> + * continue processing them.
>> + */
>> + if (req->num_pending_sgs)
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + if (usb_endpoint_xfer_isoc(dep->endpoint.desc))
>> + do_something();
>
> do_something() will always return true here.
Will do "do_something", then return true or simply return true?
>> return req->request.actual == req->request.length;
>
> This should always be true if the request completes. By spec, bulk and
> interrupt endpoints data delivery are guaranteed, and the retry/error
> detection is done at the lower level. If by chance that the host fails
> to request for data multiple times at the packet level, it will issue a
> ClearFeature(halt_ep) request to the endpoint. This will trigger dwc3 to
> stop the endpoint and cancel the transfer, and we still won't resume
> this transfer.
we can unplug the cable at any time, even mid-transfer.
--
balbi
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-29 8:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-06 3:44 [PATCH] usb: dwc3: gadget: Remove incomplete check Thinh Nguyen
2020-03-15 9:19 ` Felipe Balbi
2020-03-16 0:33 ` Thinh Nguyen
2020-03-16 7:00 ` Felipe Balbi
2020-03-16 20:37 ` Thinh Nguyen
2020-03-29 8:03 ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2020-03-29 23:44 ` Thinh Nguyen
2020-03-30 8:26 ` Felipe Balbi
2020-03-30 19:30 ` Thinh Nguyen
2020-03-30 21:34 ` Felipe Balbi
2020-03-31 1:47 ` Thinh Nguyen
2020-03-31 8:12 ` Felipe Balbi
2020-03-31 8:39 ` Thinh Nguyen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v9mn37vb.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=balbi@kernel.org \
--cc=John.Youn@synopsys.com \
--cc=Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).