From: "Diederik de Haas" <diederik@cknow-tech.com>
To: "Jonas Karlman" <jonas@kwiboo.se>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Diederik de Haas" <diederik@cknow-tech.com>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: usb: Add Rockchip RK3568 compatible for EHCI and OHCI
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 18:32:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DJ4NVA328NUV.LSPMVBFE0PD8@cknow-tech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260609154124.445182-2-jonas@kwiboo.se>
Hi Jonas,
On Tue Jun 9, 2026 at 5:41 PM CEST, Jonas Karlman wrote:
> The Rockchip RK3568 EHCI/OHCI controller depends on clk_usbphy1_480m
> being enabled, or the system may freeze when registers are accessed.
>
> Add Rockchip RK3568 EHCI and OHCI compatibles with a similar four-clock
> constraint as RK3588.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
> ---
> Existing DTs for RK3568 use the plain generic-ehci/ohci compatible,
> next patch make use of these new compatibles and adds the missing
> clk_usbphy1_480m clock references.
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ehci.yaml | 10 ++++++++++
> .../devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ohci.yaml | 5 ++++-
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ehci.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ehci.yaml
> index 55a5aa7d7a54..c49a1bbc8cfd 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ehci.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ehci.yaml
> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ properties:
> - ibm,476gtr-ehci
> - nxp,lpc1850-ehci
> - qca,ar7100-ehci
> + - rockchip,rk3568-ehci
> - rockchip,rk3588-ehci
> - snps,hsdk-v1.0-ehci
> - socionext,uniphier-ehci
> @@ -186,6 +187,15 @@ allOf:
> required:
> - clocks
> - clock-names
> + - if:
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + contains:
> + const: rockchip,rk3568-ehci
> + then:
> + properties:
> + clocks:
> + minItems: 4
I think that the constraint for rk3588 is this:
- minItems: 1
- maxItems: 4
Like ~ every other compatible; there's no 'branch' for rk3588-ehci.
That's different from what you add for rk3568. Is that deliberate?
Because from the commit message I assumed they should be the same.
> unevaluatedProperties: false
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ohci.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ohci.yaml
> index d42f448fa204..5f1b4d2bff89 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ohci.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ohci.yaml
> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ properties:
> - hpe,gxp-ohci
> - ibm,476gtr-ohci
> - ingenic,jz4740-ohci
> + - rockchip,rk3568-ohci
> - rockchip,rk3588-ohci
> - snps,hsdk-v1.0-ohci
> - const: generic-ohci
> @@ -198,7 +199,9 @@ allOf:
> properties:
> compatible:
> contains:
> - const: rockchip,rk3588-ohci
> + enum:
> + - rockchip,rk3568-ohci
> + - rockchip,rk3588-ohci
Here they clearly do have the same constraint.
Cheers,
Diederik
> then:
> properties:
> clocks:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-09 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260609154124.445182-1-jonas@kwiboo.se>
2026-06-09 15:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: usb: Add Rockchip RK3568 compatible for EHCI and OHCI Jonas Karlman
2026-06-09 15:56 ` Conor Dooley
2026-06-09 16:32 ` Diederik de Haas [this message]
2026-06-09 18:06 ` Jonas Karlman
2026-06-09 19:51 ` Diederik de Haas
2026-06-09 15:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: Fix devices suspend freeze on RK3568/RK3566 Jonas Karlman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DJ4NVA328NUV.LSPMVBFE0PD8@cknow-tech.com \
--to=diederik@cknow-tech.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox