From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
Cc: Nehal Bakulchandra Shah <Nehal-Bakulchandra.shah@amd.com>,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kun.liu2@amd.com,
alexander.deucher@amd.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/2] usb: dwc3: pci add property to allow user space role switch
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 10:26:08 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YSXwkKJ53d/uwnhy@kuha.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YSXqsXmuom2fFiKN@kuha.fi.intel.com>
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 10:01:05AM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 08:55:41AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Nehal Bakulchandra Shah <Nehal-Bakulchandra.shah@amd.com> writes:
> >
> > > For AMD platform there is a requirement to enable user space role
> > > switch from host to device and device to host as customer platform is not
> > > completely capable of OTG i.e. with type C controller it does not have PD
> > > to support role switching. Hence, based ACPI/EC interrupt role switch is
> > > triggered by the usemode script running in background.
> > usermode ?
>
> Couldn't you capture that ACPI/EC interrupt in kernel?
>
> > > Signed-off-by: Nehal Bakulchandra Shah <Nehal-Bakulchandra.shah@amd.com>
> >
> > I'm okay with this, just wondering if we need to Document the property
> > somewhere.
> >
> > @Heikki, is there a place to document these private properties that's
> > not on DT binding document?
>
> The build-in properties are not documented separately. I've always
> tried to supply DT bindings for all new properties I've proposed.
>
> In this case though, do we need the new property at all? Why not just
> register a normal USB role switch on this platform? It can be either a
> dummy role switch that only passes the user space input to dwc3, or,
> perhaps ideally, it would also be a driver that captures that ACPI/EC
> event/notification and then passes the information from it to dwc3.
Please ignore the above question. Sorry. Let me try again...
The question is: why not just capture that ACPI/EC "interrupt" in
kernel and then just use that information to set the dwc3 role switch?
No extra properties needed.
thanks,
--
heikki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-25 7:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-24 19:23 [RESEND PATCH 2/2] usb: dwc3: pci add property to allow user space role switch Nehal Bakulchandra Shah
2021-08-25 5:55 ` Felipe Balbi
2021-08-25 7:01 ` Heikki Krogerus
2021-08-25 7:26 ` Heikki Krogerus [this message]
2021-08-25 13:50 ` Deucher, Alexander
2021-08-26 14:06 ` Heikki Krogerus
2021-09-02 12:45 ` Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra
2021-09-09 12:55 ` Heikki Krogerus
2021-08-25 7:43 ` Felipe Balbi
2021-08-26 11:13 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YSXwkKJ53d/uwnhy@kuha.fi.intel.com \
--to=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Nehal-Bakulchandra.shah@amd.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=balbi@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kun.liu2@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).