From: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: Julio Faracco <jcfaracco@gmail.com>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, axboe@kernel.dk, tglx@linutronix.de,
damien.lemoal@wdc.com, dkadashev@gmail.com,
paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com,
niklas.cassel@wdc.com, macro@orcam.me.uk, caihuoqing@baidu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: fixing some clang warnings inside usb host drivers
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 10:46:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yb9TxT4Z57AN/lgm@rowland.harvard.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0804469c-664a-219d-bb6a-b4e5f133edd9@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 04:59:44PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> On 2021/12/19 11:50, Alan Stern wrote:
> > You should read this code in usb_submit_urb():
> >
> > max = usb_endpoint_maxp(&ep->desc);
> > if (max <= 0) {
> > dev_dbg(&dev->dev,
> > "bogus endpoint ep%d%s in %s (bad maxpacket %d)\n",
> > usb_endpoint_num(&ep->desc), is_out ? "out" : "in",
> > __func__, max);
> > return -EMSGSIZE;
> > }
> >
> > As far as I know, every code path leading to qtd_fill() has to pass this
> > test.
>
> Excuse me, but surely qtd_fill() is using the result from usb_maxpacket()
>
> ----------------------------------------
> static struct list_head *
> qh_urb_transaction (
> struct ehci_hcd *ehci,
> struct urb *urb,
> struct list_head *head,
> gfp_t flags
> ) {
> (...snipped...)
> maxpacket = usb_maxpacket(urb->dev, urb->pipe, !is_input);
>
> /*
> * buffer gets wrapped in one or more qtds;
> * last one may be "short" (including zero len)
> * and may serve as a control status ack
> */
> for (;;) {
> int this_qtd_len;
>
> this_qtd_len = qtd_fill(ehci, qtd, buf, this_sg_len, token,
> maxpacket);
> this_sg_len -= this_qtd_len;
> len -= this_qtd_len;
> buf += this_qtd_len;
> (...snipped...)
> }
> ----------------------------------------
>
> and usb_maxpacket() may return 0 ?
>
> ----------------------------------------
> static inline __u16
> usb_maxpacket(struct usb_device *udev, int pipe, int is_out)
> {
> struct usb_host_endpoint *ep;
> unsigned epnum = usb_pipeendpoint(pipe);
>
> if (is_out) {
> WARN_ON(usb_pipein(pipe));
> ep = udev->ep_out[epnum];
> } else {
> WARN_ON(usb_pipeout(pipe));
> ep = udev->ep_in[epnum];
> }
> if (!ep)
> return 0;
>
> /* NOTE: only 0x07ff bits are for packet size... */
> return usb_endpoint_maxp(&ep->desc);
> }
> ----------------------------------------
You should also read this code in usb_submit_urb():
ep = usb_pipe_endpoint(dev, urb->pipe);
if (!ep)
return -ENOENT;
together with the definition of usb_pipe_endpoint():
static inline struct usb_host_endpoint *
usb_pipe_endpoint(struct usb_device *dev, unsigned int pipe)
{
struct usb_host_endpoint **eps;
eps = usb_pipein(pipe) ? dev->ep_in : dev->ep_out;
return eps[usb_pipeendpoint(pipe)];
}
As you can see, this carries out the same calculation that
usb_maxpacket() makes, but it fails with an error if ep would be NULL.
> If we don't need to care about the possibility of returning 0 (including
> all possible race conditions taken into account), please explain it as a
> comment block.
You may write such a comment and submit it as a patch, if you like. But
keep in mind that the USB subsystem is full of potential race conditions
like this one, kept in check by appropriate locking and synchronization.
Writing a comment for each and every possible occurrence would be
daunting and counterproductive.
Also, if you like, you may submit a patch that changes
qh_urb_transaction() so that it calls usb_endpoint_maxp() rather than
usb_maxpacket() (using &urb->ep->desc as the argument rather than
urb->pipe), so that it more closely imitates the calculation in
usb_submit_urb(). You can even add a WARN_ON(maxpacket == 0), but I
do not expect it will ever be triggered.
Alan Stern
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-19 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-18 4:24 [PATCH] usb: fixing some clang warnings inside usb host drivers Julio Faracco
2021-12-18 9:13 ` Greg KH
2021-12-18 10:49 ` Joe Perches
2021-12-18 18:05 ` Alan Stern
2021-12-19 1:41 ` Tetsuo Handa
2021-12-19 2:50 ` Alan Stern
2021-12-19 7:59 ` Tetsuo Handa
2021-12-19 15:46 ` Alan Stern [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yb9TxT4Z57AN/lgm@rowland.harvard.edu \
--to=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=caihuoqing@baidu.com \
--cc=damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
--cc=dkadashev@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jcfaracco@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
--cc=niklas.cassel@wdc.com \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox