From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Jules Maselbas <jmaselbas@kalray.eu>
Cc: linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>,
Minas Harutyunyan <hminas@synopsys.com>,
Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@foss.st.com>,
Yann Sionneau <ysionneau@kalray.eu>,
Michael Grzeschik <mgr@pengutronix.de>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3 0/3] Cleanup the call ordering of phy_init and phy_power_on
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 14:45:23 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yl/PK6Mw4BQeoAOA@matsya> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220407102108.24211-1-jmaselbas@kalray.eu>
On 07-04-22, 12:21, Jules Maselbas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Last year Ahmad asked what is the correct order when calling phy_init
> and phy_power_on. Since then, I didn't see the situation improve much
> and I am once again toying around with usb phy driver.
>
> The following two patches were in my tree for a year... Last year i
> previously tried to change the call order in the dwc2 driver but this
> requires the relevent phy to be also compatible with the "new" ordering.
> The stm32-usbphyc driver wasn't compatible, I am not sure if that is
> still is the case.
>
> For now simply add documentation, hopefully correct, but I am not an
> expert on actual phy sementics or usage in the kernel. And add warning
> when the order is not what's expected.
Applied, thanks
--
~Vinod
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-20 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-07 10:21 [PATCH RESEND v3 0/3] Cleanup the call ordering of phy_init and phy_power_on Jules Maselbas
2022-04-07 10:21 ` [PATCH RESEND v3 1/3] phy: core: Add documentation of phy operation order Jules Maselbas
2022-04-07 10:21 ` [PATCH RESEND v3 2/3] phy: core: Update documentation syntax Jules Maselbas
2022-04-13 6:02 ` Vinod Koul
2022-04-13 9:53 ` Jules Maselbas
2022-04-13 9:59 ` Vinod Koul
2022-04-13 11:13 ` Jules Maselbas
2022-04-07 10:21 ` [PATCH RESEND v3 3/3] phy: core: Warn when phy_power_on is called before phy_init Jules Maselbas
2022-04-20 9:15 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yl/PK6Mw4BQeoAOA@matsya \
--to=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=amelie.delaunay@foss.st.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=hminas@synopsys.com \
--cc=jmaselbas@kalray.eu \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgr@pengutronix.de \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=ysionneau@kalray.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox