From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez <jtornosm@redhat.com>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] USB: core: skip unconfiguration if device doesn't support it
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 16:13:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yn5nc2mSHrdy/8h6@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yn5mliJq+7W8khe9@rowland.harvard.edu>
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 10:09:26AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 11:50:26AM +0200, Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez wrote:
> > Ok, I will try to identify the "bad" devices in some way.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > José Ignacio
> >
> >
> > On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 1:48 PM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'll drop this for now as there are no in-kernel users for this quirk
> > > yet. When there is a need for one, please resubmit it.
>
> Hold on; Greg's comment doesn't seem fair. There are no in-kernel
> users for this quirk because it is meant to be a user API. (Just as
> there are no in-kernel users for read(2) -- it is there so that
> userspace can call it).
True, but the kernel calls read(2) itself as well in places, it just
looks a bit different, kernel_read_file() :)
> Jose does have users for the new quirk: Anybody with one of the bad
> Bluetooth CSR knockoff chips. Now I agree; it would be great if there
> was some way to identify them automatically. But if that's not
> possible, the only alternative is to allow userspace to set the quirk
> flag whenever it knows the quirk is needed.
Is that the case here that we know how to identify this? I thought
Marcel said something else was happening here.
If the bluetooth developers/maintainers say this is needed for some
devices to work properly and they will be handled in userspace somehow
through a udev rule or the like, I will gladly add this. But I thought
this thread died out as it was determined that this wasn't needed at
this point in time which is why I dropped it.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-13 14:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-04 15:16 [PATCH v5] USB: core: skip unconfiguration if device doesn't support it Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez
2022-05-04 17:54 ` Alan Stern
2022-05-12 11:47 ` Greg KH
2022-05-13 9:50 ` Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez
2022-05-13 14:09 ` Alan Stern
2022-05-13 14:13 ` Greg KH [this message]
2022-05-13 14:26 ` Alan Stern
2022-05-13 14:46 ` Greg KH
2022-05-13 14:58 ` Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez
2022-05-17 13:58 ` Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez
2022-05-13 15:00 ` Bjørn Mork
2022-05-16 5:45 ` Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yn5nc2mSHrdy/8h6@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jtornosm@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox