From: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
To: Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
kernel@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: hub: port: add sysfs entry to switch port power
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 10:09:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YnvDlhlcVGoerhLz@rowland.harvard.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220510231317.1874608-1-m.grzeschik@pengutronix.de>
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 01:13:17AM +0200, Michael Grzeschik wrote:
> This patch adds an sysfs switch to enable/disable a port on an power
> switchable hub. It also ensures that the associated device gets
> disconnected from the logical usb tree.
This says what the patch does. It does not explain why the patch was
written or why anybody would want to switch the power on a hub's port.
> Signed-off-by: Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/usb/core/port.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/port.c b/drivers/usb/core/port.c
> index d5bc36ca5b1f77..abc618d87888f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/core/port.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/port.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,52 @@ static int usb_port_block_power_off;
>
> static const struct attribute_group *port_dev_group[];
>
> +static ssize_t port_power_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> + const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + struct usb_port *port_dev = to_usb_port(dev);
> + struct usb_device *udev = port_dev->child;
> + struct usb_device *hdev = to_usb_device(dev->parent->parent);
> + struct usb_hub *hub = usb_hub_to_struct_hub(hdev);
> + int port1 = port_dev->portnum;
> + bool value;
> + int rc = 0;
> +
> + if (!hub)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (hub->in_reset)
> + return -EBUSY;
What point is there in doing this test? The value of hub->in_reset may
change an instant later. Unless you acquire the hub's lock first.
For that matter, you should be holding the hub's lock while you call
usb_hub_to_struct_hub() -- unless you don't care if the hub gets
disconnected while this routine is running. Or if udev does.
> +
> + rc = strtobool(buf, &value);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> +
> + if (value)
> + usb_remote_wakeup(hdev);
Why call usb_remote_wakeup()? The function was not intended to be used
this way; it was meant to be used when a device sends a wakeup request.
Furthermore, nothing prevents the hub from going back into runtime
suspend the moment this function completes.
If you want to bring a USB device out of runtime suspend, call
usb_autoresume_device(). And then don't forget to call
usb_autosuspend_device() when you're done with it.
> +
> + rc = usb_hub_set_port_power(hdev, hub, port1, value);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
You probably should acquire the port's lock before doing this.
Otherwise some other thread might be doing something else to the port at
the same time.
> +
> + if (!value) {
> + usb_clear_port_feature(hdev, port1, USB_PORT_FEAT_C_CONNECTION);
> + if (!port_dev->is_superspeed)
> + usb_clear_port_feature(hdev, port1, USB_PORT_FEAT_C_ENABLE);
> +
> + if (udev) {
> + port_dev->child = NULL;
That assignment is not necessary; usb_disconnect() will take care of it.
> + usb_disconnect(&udev);
> + }
> + }
Alan Stern
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-11 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-10 23:13 [PATCH] usb: hub: port: add sysfs entry to switch port power Michael Grzeschik
2022-05-11 5:43 ` Greg KH
2022-05-11 8:26 ` Michael Grzeschik
2022-05-11 8:33 ` kernel test robot
2022-05-11 14:09 ` Alan Stern [this message]
2022-05-11 20:37 ` Michael Grzeschik
2022-05-12 1:19 ` Alan Stern
2022-05-14 19:52 ` Alan Stern
2022-05-31 23:45 ` Michael Grzeschik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YnvDlhlcVGoerhLz@rowland.harvard.edu \
--to=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.grzeschik@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox