Re: [PATCH] usb: host: ehci-q: Fix ehci_submit_single_step_set_feature annotation typo

[Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 11:29:25PM -0700, Hyunwoo Kim wrote:
> >From 3ba1bf7eb8e672fcd5be65080a265d3428d1303a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:30:10 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] usb: host: ehci-q: Fix ehci_submit_single_step_set_feature annotation typo

This shouldn't be in the body of the email, try using 'git send-email'
instead.

> 
> I found the "argument" typo.
> It seems that "argument" is more correct than "arguement".

That is much better, thanks.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c
> index 1163af6fad77..807e64991e3e 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c
> @@ -1162,7 +1162,7 @@ submit_async (
>   * This is done in two parts: first SETUP req for GetDesc is sent then
>   * 15 seconds later, the IN stage for GetDesc starts to req data from dev
>   *
> - * is_setup : i/p arguement decides which of the two stage needs to be
> + * is_setup : i/p argument decides which of the two stage needs to be
>   * performed; TRUE - SETUP and FALSE - IN+STATUS
>   * Returns 0 if success
>   */
> --
> 2.25.1
> 
> Dear Greg,
> 
> I'm sending the patch back because the greg email bot emailed me.
> I don't think there was anything wrong with the patch format.
> Did I receive an email saying my patch was in the wrong format because 
> my patch was a minor typo fix and the description was too short?


This looks better, but can you resend this without the above header in
the body and then we can apply it.

thanks,

greg k-h