From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CF89C433F5 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2022 10:05:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229578AbiJGKFL (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Oct 2022 06:05:11 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44730 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229745AbiJGKFJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Oct 2022 06:05:09 -0400 Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9BD37F243; Fri, 7 Oct 2022 03:05:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1665137109; x=1696673109; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=qQ1zrUjHcG+48NjTzwE6c3iRSqpwNICl7g4gQRyV8HQ=; b=K9peTyuNlHXPRXaLsl9qJo/cNKjB6IeY5fv2k59VTbLfn1VeoRDgXhxo KdlLGKAN+KWp44R7YCyUjf2CMatwSPuZPkMngS5eOisQwqJa4lvBUgFIa AVdIxuWtJUVomDF5zQgslnydl9oz5GjqowPDJ1h1e/HD/uxQagMhcbD8M hHBgyv3CWxGjJ1rLXsYANRpw70xSO8AaieMu7xRG13gFB4nPQfSKCFb+w 0BieczLoyAFUSbr2ig2i9UEX7S4rbFqC8DNb08M+ZNiyXIzolht4QJe9c s5NQ2KRWRJydZNLsPwClgwnKJXqPyJ3PmJNTcM+8NxpnTWgxa1bhjo5CS g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10492"; a="283419553" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.95,166,1661842800"; d="scan'208";a="283419553" Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Oct 2022 03:04:56 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10492"; a="767528763" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.95,166,1661842800"; d="scan'208";a="767528763" Received: from kuha.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.185]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with SMTP; 07 Oct 2022 03:04:52 -0700 Received: by kuha.fi.intel.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 07 Oct 2022 13:04:51 +0300 Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2022 13:04:51 +0300 From: Heikki Krogerus To: Bastian Rieck Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, grzegorz.alibozek@gmail.com, andrew.co@free.fr, meven29@gmail.com, pchernik@gmail.com, jorge.cep.mart@gmail.com, danielmorgan@disroot.org, bernie@codewiz.org, saipavanchitta1998@gmail.com, rubin@starset.net, maniette@gmail.com, nate@kde.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] usb: typec: ucsi: Check connection on resume Message-ID: References: <20220907115626.21976-1-heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> <11781567.uqkIggiGGz@nimue> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <11781567.uqkIggiGGz@nimue> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 12:00:16PM +0200, Bastian Rieck wrote: > Dear Heikki, dear all, > > I am still unable to reproduce the previous error messages I > mentioned. In the meantime, the UCSI issues disappeared with 5.19.9 > for me (!). I think this is related to a revert by Takashi Iwai [1] > in 5.19.8. > > Given these data, would it be useful to test your patch against > 5.19.9 or a more recent version? No need. I'm just about to resend these. thanks, -- heikki