From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DAA21CBEB8; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 14:37:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724337434; cv=none; b=YkbbjtZ3cyemqz5Hse/+rpKP2ddrm5PekYgvbzwo7IvDa3ugAizzJUf/g2AmckbK4bGWPTN7rCXRRXU9gDY6VFdX1DQvg233m+F2rZBCztNYA2OBEGYBo/nK3g6QkRUobs6LlrBOolXnZLEzCvmrxkWmt8S5b4laM+HEu8HF+U4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724337434; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZkpJaD0BSKB4PQoNUPxvvmFUzWqr/hvDqpY1MhGCy+0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=faJyZ6h31GaFoU1CAN6zSc0d5iG1n6wvNw+lknGLsQINBDQOo53wMr8tcmhOiIO8VAmEAkZYbzB98mNeCzLbAufvezXLpTg9H2Ornq0hv2hLDqazOePbBMa0EYxVGnt9X7CuMAM397GCaiJWoJw4JHOGO50vNkhhgcNGmrcIeKA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ctOmC7Y9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ctOmC7Y9" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 72AA8C32782; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 14:37:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1724337434; bh=ZkpJaD0BSKB4PQoNUPxvvmFUzWqr/hvDqpY1MhGCy+0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ctOmC7Y9I5pctjwa+bfvcuJQnPKxeiOldkSiZey7L8AQjTgSHSocZlA+zCq72uwB3 LWVTnaND1yi3ccNgiiz9wrc3Cals3TBSy4p7BVwYX94vzhmWuOJzOP3jmenujcCNcS bW5GDiO9y7HxNnxU5wTD9Dn/akgxr6wDJaGfWz0YZ3L12Hl+VyO7DwR2FVy+V8+pLs 9P4wbYXFM3++q8YqIGml3T1hkx8NQfayBQw3YkMI4GniXfzrHxowf/b6Lci3uYP1Mh dw+8t2cS+cRA4FyWfmgXtOO3RiS5Gfx7MvRajOXarKVShQF4RViDrSa5HuO1tMNfId i19liD/cvcqFg== Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 22:37:05 +0800 From: Tzung-Bi Shih To: Stephen Boyd Cc: chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Douglas Anderson , Pin-yen Lin , Andrzej Hajda , Benson Leung , Conor Dooley , Daniel Vetter , David Airlie , Dmitry Baryshkov , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Guenter Roeck , Jernej Skrabec , Jonas Karlman , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Laurent Pinchart , Lee Jones , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Neil Armstrong , Prashant Malani , Robert Foss , Rob Herring , Thomas Zimmermann , Alexandre Belloni , Andy Shevchenko , Daniel Scally , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Heikki Krogerus , Ivan Orlov , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Mika Westerberg , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Sakari Ailus , Vinod Koul Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 16/17] platform/chrome: cros_ec_typec: Support DP muxing Message-ID: References: <20240819223834.2049862-1-swboyd@chromium.org> <20240819223834.2049862-17-swboyd@chromium.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240819223834.2049862-17-swboyd@chromium.org> On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 03:38:30PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > @@ -671,6 +674,20 @@ static int cros_typec_configure_mux(struct cros_typec_data *typec, int port_num, > if (port->mux_flags == resp.flags && port->role == pd_ctrl->role) > return 0; > > + dp_enabled = resp.flags & USB_PD_MUX_DP_ENABLED; > + hpd_asserted = resp.flags & USB_PD_MUX_HPD_LVL; > + /* > + * Assume the first port to have HPD asserted is the one muxed to DP > + * (i.e. active_port). When there's only one port this delays setting > + * the active_port until HPD is asserted, but before that the > + * drm_connector looks disconnected so active_port doesn't need to be > + * set. > + */ > + if (dp_bridge && hpd_asserted && !dp_bridge->active_port) > + dp_bridge->active_port = port; > + > + is_active_port = !dp_bridge || dp_bridge->active_port == port; Why `!dp_bridge`? When will `dp_bridge` be NULL?