From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC0E5156875; Thu, 26 Sep 2024 12:27:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727353659; cv=none; b=JXg0JoQrRWDf5Mu6L6nqBGfubdXm4xnK4U/QuCv1ZYkGA5UOs/sdG8FIKQeOtr19NDmHfW4Qqk7jJV8Rxd6bi30FhMs9GeNWqZKpReffZFu/ZA/Y3/06qhAnN7hteGUZph1armYsKNiE3cT1L5vsrq9ImhzbFZQuyhYmiu2zW8w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727353659; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YnO8jzSwusUqP5MrbcUGwNCHwAl9f2jDtgahK2k07Qs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Ix62nOlOlrm35B1drG98JzFyK5exgMfx0J2WPmGTWe5+hwAedDZEaUf2Wdc1Ax7Iz1eyUQ5XNWg6dleB7+ipJWH1E45kJ0OwL6tVDZfNjvppj+uwWjIR9WBFgHtThCIuzEGLoc+V//ciGWjSb4QlQ0MMLpsIFGrrbDQKWyXSjWc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=ifVOkBFs; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="ifVOkBFs" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1727353658; x=1758889658; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=YnO8jzSwusUqP5MrbcUGwNCHwAl9f2jDtgahK2k07Qs=; b=ifVOkBFsHWWuvGt5xPGGmfR+z+fp/VdDFltHVrqice1W402H0cj0c/Yk MXXxiiZ3dlc0/mmecO/pEGC6nZhLCw8kbvrssTV3FYFTL3mLRLL4yg4Ud kMqlkHhwOzNgpkcpW3kMVfWNDVsVJ+u1TyxdTgNUdSMjG1hHGOKESTQu6 hfixUJJEKDKjVoiQrCgAxvXBjIHj5JZfkyHmv+/puMSUTyNd1uv7hWFgP Mu1v1ofl4UDrE/2P3kbCl7D3NFyCoNspCq4uXACvBl6kndoUpFIcGRfsL aQYQwIWkczkoC6HE58CtpUY/j2vpKht/ermHMzdgvA5nSe5AIi8JZgucw A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: RWCEJQ/6Rmql6rmVW3R4tw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 7+nQZ3xEQMKfzAt8WU0kaQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11207"; a="26309735" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,155,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="26309735" Received: from orviesa005.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.145]) by orvoesa111.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Sep 2024 05:27:37 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: DdVHgut6RUqt5LdzA9CnAQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: obOfpQMVTlSJ1ji0jd+aqg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,155,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="76907851" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orviesa005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Sep 2024 05:27:34 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1stnal-0000000DC2k-1uEh; Thu, 26 Sep 2024 15:27:31 +0300 Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 15:27:31 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Dmitry Baryshkov Cc: Markus Elfring , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Ajay Gupta , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Haotien Hsu , Heikki Krogerus , Utkarsh Patel , Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= , Wolfram Sang , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] usb: typec: ucsi: ccg: Adjustments for common code in two functions Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 02:20:19PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Thu, 26 Sept 2024 at 14:12, Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 12:26:24AM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: ... > > but in any case the thing is that kfree() > > probably can be done using __free(). Then PM runtime handled differently. > > That's a separate cleanup in my opinion. Yes and for that we do not need an intermediate change, right? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko