From: Olivier Dautricourt <olivierdautricourt@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Mathias Nyman" <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Michał Pecio" <michal.pecio@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: xhci: xhci_setup_port_arrays: early -ENODEV if maxports is 0.
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 21:04:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZwA8OWFJhAuvWDJh@freebase> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2024100407-hatless-goofy-bf12@gregkh>
Hello,
On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 10:07:01AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 07:23:29AM +0200, Olivier Dautricourt wrote:
> > If the controller reports HCSPARAMS1.maxports==0 then we can skip the
> > whole function: it would fail later after doing a bunch of unnecessary
> > stuff. It can occur on a buggy hardware (the value is driven by external
> > signals).
>
> What "buggy hardware" is this that can not pass the USB testing for this
> type of issue?
This is a behaviour found while debugging a custom firmware where this
value happen to be controlled here, i don't know any hardware out there
with such issue, this change should be seen as a software nitpick and is
not trying to fix a specific hardware.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Olivier Dautricourt <olivierdautricourt@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c | 5 +++++
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
> > index d2900197a49e..e8406db78782 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
> > @@ -2160,6 +2160,11 @@ static int xhci_setup_port_arrays(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, gfp_t flags)
> > struct device *dev = xhci_to_hcd(xhci)->self.sysdev;
> >
> > num_ports = HCS_MAX_PORTS(xhci->hcs_params1);
> > + if (num_ports == 0) {
> > + xhci_warn(xhci, "Host controller has no port enabled\n");
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > + }
>
> Should this be backported to older kernels, if so, how far back if this
> is common hardware?
I don't think this would have to be ported to stable trees: The function
handles the case without failure: the 0 value is propagated until line
2220 and fails on condition:
if (xhci->usb2_rhub.num_ports == 0 && xhci->usb3_rhub.num_ports == 0) {
xhci_warn(xhci, "No ports on the roothubs?\n");
return -ENODEV;
}
The change merely avoids passing 0 value through kcalloc_node calls and
unnecessary accesses to the capability structures of the controller.
Kr,
Olivier
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-04 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-30 5:23 [PATCH] usb: xhci: xhci_setup_port_arrays: early -ENODEV if maxports is 0 Olivier Dautricourt
2024-10-04 8:07 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-10-04 19:04 ` Olivier Dautricourt [this message]
2024-10-04 10:57 ` Michał Pecio
2024-10-04 19:14 ` Olivier Dautricourt
2024-10-04 21:05 ` Michał Pecio
2024-10-10 12:50 ` Mathias Nyman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZwA8OWFJhAuvWDJh@freebase \
--to=olivierdautricourt@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
--cc=michal.pecio@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox