From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
To: Michal Pecio <michal.pecio@gmail.com>,
Lachlan Hodges <lachlan.hodges@morsemicro.com>
Cc: mathias.nyman@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
oneukum@suse.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
arien.judge@morsemicro.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] usb: xhci: use BIT_ULL for CRCR bits
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 12:07:03 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a47f7c2d-d122-4cb3-bc03-1165b3578e6d@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260730100434.3354b600.michal.pecio@gmail.com>
On 7/30/26 11:04, Michal Pecio wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2026 15:45:21 +1000, Lachlan Hodges wrote:
>> The CRCR register is 64 bits wide - commit abe93f27cdd7
>> ("xhci: use BIT macro") changed the flag definitions from (1 << n),
>> a signed int, to BIT(n), an unsigned long. Within
>> xhci_set_cmd_ring_deq(), the following operation is performed on the
>> CRCR register:
>>
>> ...
>> crcr &= ~CMD_RING_PTR_MASK;
>> crcr |= deq_dma;
>> crcr &= ~CMD_RING_CYCLE;
>> crcr |= xhci->cmd_ring->cycle_state;
>> ...
>>
>> Previously, ~CMD_RING_CYCLE was ~(int)1, a negative signed value
>> (0xFFFFFFFE with the sign bit set). Widening a negative signed int to
>> u64 sign-extends it to 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFE, correctly clearing only bit
>> 0 and preserving the 64-bit pointer written two lines above.
>>
>> After the change when running on 32 bit kernels, ~CMD_RING_CYCLE is
>> ~(unsigned long)1UL. On a 32-bit host this is an unsigned 32-bit
>> value (0xFFFFFFFE, no sign bit). Widening an unsigned value to u64
>> zero-extends it instead (0x00000000FFFFFFFE), so the subsequent AND
>> silently clears bits 63:32 of crcr, truncating the command ring
>> pointer that was just written before the value reaches hardware.
>>
>> To fix, similar to how CMD_RING_PTR_MASK is defined, make sure we
>> use the BIT_ULL variant when defining the CRCR bits.
>>
>> Fixes: abe93f27cdd7 ("xhci: use BIT macro")
>> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-sonnet-5
>> Signed-off-by: Lachlan Hodges <lachlan.hodges@morsemicro.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Hi, I experienced this when running the tip of wireless-next on
>> a raspberry pi 4B compiled for arm32. The main symptoms were the
>> following log message:
>>
>> [ 0.549897] raspberrypi-firmware soc:firmware: Attached to firmware from 2021-02-25T12:11:39
>> [ 0.626859] xhci_hcd 0000:01:00.0: xHCI Host Controller
>> [ 0.626889] xhci_hcd 0000:01:00.0: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1
>> [ 0.812619] xhci_hcd 0000:01:00.0: hcc params 0x002841eb hci version 0x100 quirks 0x0000200000000890
>> [ 0.813188] xhci_hcd 0000:01:00.0: xHCI Host Controller
>> [ 0.813203] xhci_hcd 0000:01:00.0: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 2
>> [ 0.813219] xhci_hcd 0000:01:00.0: Host supports USB 3.0 SuperSpeed
>> [ 0.813602] hub 1-0:1.0: USB hub found
>> [ 0.814052] hub 2-0:1.0: USB hub found
>> [ 0.952714] xhci_hcd 0000:01:00.0: ERROR mismatched command completion event
>>
>> Additionally running lsusb just hangs. Running the same kernel compiled
>> for aarch64 worked fine. Bisected to the commit in the Fixes line
>> above. Additionally a USB device plugged in to the USB3.0 (or 2.0)
>> did not enumerate. Once this patch is applied the USB device
>> enumerates properly on the tip of wireless-next 4a0bd262df75 ("wifi:
>> mac80211: fix per-STA profile length in cross-link CSA parsing").
>
> Makes sense, including observed symptoms.
>
> A system with IOMMU would fault on top of that, but the accesses
> are reads, so hopefully no corruption in absence of IOMMU.
>
>> Happy to test alternate fix proposals! Thanks.
>
> I think the sort of code you quoted should work without surprises,
> so widening these macros to ULL is right.
>
> And there is a few more. They currently don't break anything, but
> neither does CMD_RING_ABORT or CMD_RING_RUNNING for that matter.
>
> ERST_EHB
> EP_CTX_CYCLE_MASK
>
> Let's see what Mathias thinks about it.
>
Fully agree,
We should probably try to get it into 7.2
Thanks Lachlan for debugging and elegantly describing the issue.
-Mathias
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-30 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-30 5:45 [RFC PATCH] usb: xhci: use BIT_ULL for CRCR bits Lachlan Hodges
2026-07-30 8:04 ` Michal Pecio
2026-07-30 9:07 ` Mathias Nyman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a47f7c2d-d122-4cb3-bc03-1165b3578e6d@linux.intel.com \
--to=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arien.judge@morsemicro.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=lachlan.hodges@morsemicro.com \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
--cc=michal.pecio@gmail.com \
--cc=oneukum@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox