From: Neill Kapron <nkapron@google.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: corbet@lwn.net, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] usb: gadget: f_fs: Introduce rw_proxy file descriptors
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 20:35:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajBiEqs_Nhu6HSL-@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026061503-ripening-jokingly-eb4e@gregkh>
On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 04:35:39AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2026 at 06:10:02PM +0000, Neill Kapron wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c
> > index 4c1bafb3eef5..0ccfdcfb1810 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c
> > @@ -159,7 +159,9 @@ struct ffs_epfile {
> > struct mutex mutex;
> >
> > struct ffs_data *ffs;
> > - struct ffs_ep *ep; /* P: ffs->eps_lock */
> > + struct ffs_ep *ep; /* P: ffs->eps_lock */
> > + struct ffs_epfile *epfile_in; /* P: ffs->eps_lock */
> > + struct ffs_epfile *epfile_out; /* P: ffs->eps_lock */
> >
> > /*
> > * Buffer for holding data from partial reads which may happen since
> > @@ -219,17 +221,20 @@ struct ffs_epfile {
> > struct ffs_buffer *read_buffer;
> > #define READ_BUFFER_DROP ((struct ffs_buffer *)ERR_PTR(-ESHUTDOWN))
> >
> > - char name[5];
> > + char name[10];
>
> Why change the size? Shouldn't that be a separate patch?
The size change is to handle the new proxy file, in the format of
'epXX_rw' (with a null terminator). The size of 10 is a remnant of an
earlier version of this patch which had a slightly different naming
scheme. I will update v2 with name[8] to which will properly reflect the
necessary size required.
> > atomic_t seqno;
> > +
> > + int opened_count; /* P: ffs->eps_lock */
>
> Attempting to track "is this file open or not" almost always fails
> horribly. Think about file descriptors that can be dup() and passed
> around, the kernel has no idea what is going on with them, nor does it
> have to.
>
> Yes, we do track if the file is opened or not already, but I'd argue
> that too is broken and should probably be removed and just use the
> normal file descriptor logic instead.
>
Ack, responded below.
>
> > @@ -1378,8 +1393,18 @@ ffs_epfile_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> >
> > mutex_unlock(&epfile->dmabufs_mutex);
> >
> > - __ffs_epfile_read_buffer_free(epfile);
> > - ffs_data_closed(epfile->ffs);
> > + spin_lock_irq(&ffs->eps_lock);
> > + if (epfile->is_rw_proxy) {
> > + epfile->epfile_in->opened_count--;
> > + if (--epfile->epfile_out->opened_count == 0)
> > + __ffs_epfile_read_buffer_free(epfile->epfile_out);
> > + } else {
> > + if (--epfile->opened_count == 0)
> > + __ffs_epfile_read_buffer_free(epfile);
>
> If you drop the opened_count, shouldn't these buffers just get freed
> when the structure themselves get freed? You are treating the count as
> a "reference counted structure" in a hand-rolled way that might not
> really be right here as it's kind of hard to prove.
>
> Either use a real reference count for the whole structure (i.e. kref)
> because you need to, or just tie the lifetime of the buffer to the
> larger structure itself. Otherwise these fake references are going to
> be a pain to track that all is correct with them...
>
I was concerned about the implementation of opened_count, and was
pursuing a proper kref approach, but it became a somewhat invasive patch
and I didn't want to pollute this patchset with said change, as I didn't
want to potentially introduce issues for users which did not need this
series.
Changing the buffer lifetime to match the larger structure is
straightforward and clean. I will implement that in v2 of this series,
as it fixes an existing issue.
Thanks for the suggestions,
Neill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-15 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-14 18:09 [PATCH 0/3] usb: gadget: f_fs: Add R/W proxy EPs and ZLP support Neill Kapron
2026-06-14 18:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] usb: gadget: f_fs: Initialize epfile->in early to fix endpoint direction checks Neill Kapron
2026-06-15 2:30 ` Greg KH
2026-06-15 20:19 ` Neill Kapron
2026-06-14 18:10 ` [PATCH 2/3] usb: gadget: f_fs: Add zero-length packet ioctl Neill Kapron
2026-06-14 18:10 ` [PATCH 3/3] usb: gadget: f_fs: Introduce rw_proxy file descriptors Neill Kapron
2026-06-15 2:35 ` Greg KH
2026-06-15 20:35 ` Neill Kapron [this message]
2026-06-15 2:30 ` [PATCH 0/3] usb: gadget: f_fs: Add R/W proxy EPs and ZLP support Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ajBiEqs_Nhu6HSL-@google.com \
--to=nkapron@google.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox