From: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>
To: Liu Jiazi <jiazi.liu1984@gmail.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>,
"oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev" <oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev>,
"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
Jiazi Liu <liujiazi@amazon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] usb: dwc3: gadget: fix IRQ storm on invalid event buffer count
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2026 23:09:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <anZYnWfDlNPRQBq3@vbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAcjFgibrFJYKYp1Q-ig6hHE_WCg5KSSZV2Fvv0zawswEdHZEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Liu Jiazi,
On Fri, Aug 07, 2026, Liu Jiazi wrote:
> Hi @Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com
>
> Thanks for the review suggestions. I've updated the patch accordingly.
> On thing I'd like to discuss: in dwc3_err_recovery_work(), after
> soft_disconnect succeeds, should we attempt soft_connect to
> recover the controller, or just leave it disconnected and let the
> upper layer (e.g. function driver like ADB) handle reconnection
> on its own?
But what would trigger the usb core to reconnect?
>
> In my testing, calling soft_connect after soft_disconnect triggers an
Can you confirm where exactly the RCU stall happens? Did you add
synchronize_irq() before the soft_connect?
> RCU stall. Simply doing soft_disconnect and notifying the
> gadget driver via dwc3_disconnect_gadget_sleepable() is sufficient —
> ADB recovers on its own after that.
> What's your recommendation here?
>
> Brs
> Jiazi
>
Also, we may need to add a resuscitate counter and a "dying" state.
Before scheduling the dwc3_err_recovery_work(), increment the counter
and set the dying state. While in this state, the controller should
reject all gadget driver's requests.
If we fail to recover more than 3 times, stop doing soft_connect.
BR,
Thinh
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-07 23:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-27 9:40 [PATCH 1/1] usb: dwc3: gadget: fix IRQ storm on invalid event buffer count Jiazi Liu
2026-08-04 23:04 ` Thinh Nguyen
2026-08-06 9:03 ` kernel test robot
2026-08-07 11:04 ` Liu Jiazi
2026-08-07 23:09 ` Thinh Nguyen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=anZYnWfDlNPRQBq3@vbox \
--to=thinh.nguyen@synopsys.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jiazi.liu1984@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liujiazi@amazon.com \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox