From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C213A39CD18; Mon, 31 Aug 2026 10:44:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788173063; cv=none; b=AW+w1U/WfYRkZw08rDPsdY8hPlKvXIRrv68dKLtJz2ow16bMmHziV9EzMcblPYAAHE9gKKEWHvb1VSlWn2yIw25s+rzfCFXp8PApeuvMPZrFFj84KpdoTMlpCvQfaZo7bdspVax3IN3xICaoVvw4wgSjhY1d5Dfg25s9wHXKMHE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788173063; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Y1F5dbjdfte0Q9rjiepAAJ9fRyvAt+kZxrnQn9fZtL0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=NFw+4UEN/zorexJu4lba67PdvcIhIffZfr2jHarPyi50+InxOc7YOSlvxEWi0vYtpVoCj2vTolBpl8anHN9Bnw0OEuRPXXvGaVaPpRimAllVbdzGIjEoGZ1tFgWnXQ6BsyuNBMzPgQY4JnCWkMBPqVzU9UVhNVUijzV2AZvhJIE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=nG3GtoQX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="nG3GtoQX" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1788173062; x=1819709062; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=Y1F5dbjdfte0Q9rjiepAAJ9fRyvAt+kZxrnQn9fZtL0=; b=nG3GtoQXKud0VSHBwGTWGGh+e81dzpxNVdr4FS5IS8YhMohjiJ8REoys 0Q82PNfu9QAw26LL/evl/skyu6b6F5pgSNpV8MJ0N6gvGMSfXrMKVRKrL JHTLpJ1X2idclsoi7IptqOmDpTf9SYd6A5zv1RJKcb513rWo6Ss2JJvm+ MFPtfq6V1bbdM2hcwkdf8c5PpFwcbX50caXsuwX+LTGAs/Nh0fON0Yuio 2mrsPe4DQWTG34MeC56TMg+O56qm3XIr2WE7McnG+eJ+xSofxUR4jiGGk Kdf6VPii+kQzwGv+ngfcdWA1ayfngQ8E/Frn8CrCFqhOdTm0Jlmo/oORa w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: GCZ+6accR7SV+WHZSLTeDg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: EbFbse/tQ/yEtTvC4ckQXw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11891"; a="87712588" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,252,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="87712588" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by fmvoesa112.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 31 Aug 2026 03:44:21 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: oCgYAhwUTpSosmKo/3Q6UA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 4K0S2USlTOeDM89t6S2euw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,252,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="298679250" Received: from black.igk.intel.com ([10.91.253.5]) by orviesa002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 31 Aug 2026 03:44:18 -0700 Received: by black.igk.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1008) id F29A699; Mon, 31 Aug 2026 12:44:16 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 12:44:16 +0200 From: Heikki Krogerus To: amber.kao@ite.com.tw Cc: jeson.yang@ite.com.tw, Yaode.Fang@ite.com.tw, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bling.Chiang@ite.com.tw, Eric.Su@ite.com.tw, doreen.lin@ite.com.tw Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] usb: typec: ucsi: Add ITE IT8851/IT8853 Type-C PD controller driver Message-ID: References: <20260807-ucsi-itepd-v7-0-998ac11ed0ef@ite.com.tw> <20260807-ucsi-itepd-v7-2-998ac11ed0ef@ite.com.tw> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Hi Amber, On Thu, Aug 27, 2026 at 08:52:12AM +0000, amber.kao@ite.com.tw wrote: > Hi Heikki, > > Thank you for the review! Also, noted on your comment regarding the changelog > in the cover letter—I will make sure to reply to questions in the original > threads for future submissions. > > I have a quick question about my next steps. I am planning to add a new > feature that builds on top of this current series. Since I really don't want > to delay or affect the progress of merging this v7 patch, would you recommend > that I wait until this series is fully merged into the tree before submitting > the new feature, or is it okay to send it out now as a separate series? No top-posting on the ml. It should be okay to make a note about the dependency on previously sent patches that the maintainer has not yet picked in the cover-letter. Thanks, > Thanks, > Amber -- heikki