Linux USB
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	driver-core@lists.linux.dev, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Mario Peter <mario.peter@leica-geosystems.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: take parent lock on deferred probe
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 16:51:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <as-XAQsMcCCklpoO@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM4MTGIILY95.YZSDZOIBBZZT@kernel.org>

On Wed, Oct 14, 2026 at 04:30:48PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Wed Oct 14, 2026 at 4:38 AM CEST, Alan Stern wrote:

> > On the other hand, there's something a bit weird about this whole thing.  
> > The problem arises when you want to probe a device whose parent has been 
> > deleted.  Isn't there some sort of protection to prevent that from ever 
> > happening?  I mean, doesn't deleting a device imply that all its 
> > descendants have been (or are in the process of being) deleted?  And of 
> > course, deleting and probing are mutually exclusive -- they can't race, 
> > right?
> 
> Yes, that's what the dev->p->dead check under the device lock protects against.
> But the new code accesses dev->parent before acquiring the device lock and
> reaching that check.

It's not just the new code; we have the same issue in __driver_attach()
bus_rescan_devices_helper() for synchronous probe too.

Johan

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-14 14:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-13 14:06 [PATCH] driver core: take parent lock on deferred probe Johan Hovold
2026-10-13 14:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 17:43 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-10-13 19:11   ` Alan Stern
2026-10-13 21:01     ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-10-14  2:38       ` Alan Stern
2026-10-14 14:30         ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-10-14 14:51           ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2026-10-14  8:15       ` Johan Hovold
2026-10-14 14:42         ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-10-14 15:14           ` Johan Hovold
2026-10-14 22:40             ` Danilo Krummrich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=as-XAQsMcCCklpoO@hovoldconsulting.com \
    --to=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mario.peter@leica-geosystems.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox