From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E55BF4CC627 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2026 11:00:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791543637; cv=none; b=UmASRseSSH8QajG1NADqWyVHw+wehmFzMwZqhD3OvAdyacScr6y4nD27B4XJkKq2/PMVMsq2rrHQhwAfynju3W6xEJupPYAE5cCz6Q6Rqo7uzjrGP0NtD/Y70tJ3XXnF+DLL3a4OV5FjxVjgQK/gaxmn+yF/SIFbTAjS9QndOfo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791543637; c=relaxed/simple; bh=STzg7n2odK3s0/NTD+fIEkDOhVuXZlSCdF3kVC6VpOo=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=HHG1moHA/D3H1qR+ZX8wLlZzyoCxUHx+M43CP/CQgst/EiSeW7LZpkvagC6zG/bR4TTTGRu8xDCvyxfu/4WCm66uYokbhvorAfoLA+JLKTO74nS3PnQ5ywgA+dUu+56fBVVJpN3LzXE7Q+NH9dwi+Qr/mZ5Bzbtbj2Xhlw2Dcow= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=WbKm67Uu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="WbKm67Uu" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1791543625; x=1823079625; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=STzg7n2odK3s0/NTD+fIEkDOhVuXZlSCdF3kVC6VpOo=; b=WbKm67Uug0yxtU7xnyNPPRylrM9py5IIttFCX/sPzSuVuUtb1yqVpvG1 ixeX7+lCa7t+RwPi468GvSsSgTr9zNprJp4GPqx2r5X6N0mQJyKlhICZ6 zUdcHvKM64HirkJW1UztQi+QzM/7ftD/HIIFdWWK/zpZMaRow1b5YWpsB FQUIjZUfU724hs5ymV0NLQNKN9J1UeuWBMJ9hlOH1N1y9Ewz3NkeCWhi8 ehLm89Zx1O+9ZIekUuQDoHD53eoXWWKdUzw9/ncZ/4CS1ClDyb5aO/up/ oUIGefA1zPx46WG4VYEVUBHkVC6SvoplA5cybn94dBzL8QBF3OJneNyIP g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: DUDos3O1SLeM9KBFst1G2g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: G7gHtWiRRvSpCZehOwYygw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11929"; a="342136" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,148,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="342136" Received: from fmviesa007.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.147]) by fmvoesa110.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Oct 2026 04:00:24 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: qYD61thxRmiEqhwakoUGiw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: IRcfOiLtQViBUhmsoHdQ5g== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,148,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="648027" Received: from ettammin-mobl2.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.245.244.17]) ([10.245.244.17]) by smtpauth.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Oct 2026 04:00:23 -0700 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2026 14:00:21 +0300 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] xhci features and fixes for usb-next To: Greg KH Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org References: <20261009095834.561578-1-mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com> <2026100935-recreate-finer-714b@gregkh> Content-Language: en-US From: Mathias Nyman In-Reply-To: <2026100935-recreate-finer-714b@gregkh> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/9/26 13:50, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Oct 09, 2026 at 12:58:20PM +0300, Mathias Nyman wrote: >> Hi Greg >> >> xhci improvements and non-urgent fixes for usb-next. >> >> One series by Michal to improve transfer event handling, otherwise >> smaller scattered patches for dbc, early dbc, sideband and generic >> xhci cleanups. > > You you want me to take all the ones here that were "clean" from the > sashiko review, and ignore the ones that were not, or do you want me to > take them all now and those issues (if they are real, at least one I > noticed is not), will be worried about later? > Let me take a closer look, I'll send a new series today. Some could be dropped, cleanup up, and submitted later, like [PATCH 1/14] Others like [PATCH 10/14] is mid series, and don't want to blindly drop it without checking if sashiko issue is valid Thanks Mathias