Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: qcom,pmic-glink: Add compatible string for SM8475

[Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>]

On 7/31/26 6:40 PM, Esteban Urrutia wrote:
> On 7/31/26 12:28 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> Somehow I confabulated the generic compatible being present in the
>> driver... I was trying to explain that
>>
>> And yes I didn't notice the 8350/8450 difference. But anyway, the
>> resolution will be one of:
>>
>> // 8450 is fully compatible
>> "qcom,sm8475-pmic-glink",
>> "qcom,sm8450-pmic-glink",
>> "qcom,pmic-glink"
>>
>> or
>>
>> // 8475 is special
>> "qcom,sm8475-pmic-glink",
>> "qcom,pmic-glink"
>>
>> depending on what you believe is more correct. I think the first
>> one fits better.
> 
> Yes, I agree the first case fits better, but I believe there is also a
> possible third case:
> 
> // 8550 is fully compatible
> "qcom,sm8475-pmic-glink",
> "qcom,sm8550-pmic-glink",
> "qcom,pmic-glink"
> 
> The reason why I believe this is that I've found SM8475 to include some
> elements such as eUSB or PHY sequences found in more recent SoCs such as
> SM8550.
> I guess that's the case since SM8475 is a respin, but I'm not sure.

pmic-glink provides three main services:

- UCSI (Type-C)
- altmode pin assignment notifications (also Type-C)
- battmgr (battery/power supply)

In that scope, I believe it's no different to 8450

Konrad