From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mout-p-101.mailbox.org (mout-p-101.mailbox.org [80.241.56.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9555741AAC; Tue, 29 Jul 2025 03:10:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.151 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753758609; cv=none; b=LrvfXIUzQzE2vTFQVmTiECjpG7ExAvsR5YZtRxYfKRRMKK3fCGrBMx94aLEhf7cnivYeEuogGGnICTviI7DAmPcrbp+xERg8riNoCxqmnEiNZUdJ8Sal5KpBQJuGGLZUYXXxE3OuHdEOjpCgS4wmMVbFKi59LL9991fbdj7kWHE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753758609; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YfUwWmSie+JBdFUcHXB+/SwHAIlZ/odzzp9WpwB6jIw=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=jyzZeT8T5f8l8jXXJ/cqKnrCOHcWpIZ4worVil58q4WEQre4AaQNjaph82LN3kEoZti+v7PoRbJXbFZlAfDSpujMn1cTYoGs4yshBA6hIGGGXj+ISBmKQUUlajVWqjFk2KMxXX6KV1CqdThGi2TjYUesKGf6AgtJNHly6CbHKx0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b=oInzvGYU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.151 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b="oInzvGYU" Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org (smtp2.mailbox.org [10.196.197.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-101.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4brgLt0pJRz9sr1; Tue, 29 Jul 2025 05:09:58 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailbox.org; s=mail20150812; t=1753758598; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=4RbrZ/Lc50No6eFKtJbvDodwX9CC0Ieuiq0+oZ1l2hA=; b=oInzvGYU3UHwKxb25kLfLUckkJ0nuHV1eKsMqHugDEGSXzGBfknsXmt7FKyC0jCERiffl5 PPPAWRB0pOH/Krk8sOx3MY0O0mmqJJn5YAqWLvyQOwl6O3P6NX37EMQl1AzDKPcW4XtujJ Pa+HyNyn6A/lwsGUiLewXdE/9/xNKWOwAIGGqozEl24r3X8rHsBZZQvFXrYk/ptHo5wyVh +xXgrvAMIMQ5gJECKkfEFFk93f/AnSS6zIS3z9L8zz8BTfffsLzWcpM8FW8zYi9vQ709/b 2YYFcLCU0D85kQMGepiDsMmmD5UkNXtOaXFlyQE+QfhoSAzDAF/6zXQteQqEBg== Message-ID: Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 05:09:55 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: renesas-xhci: Fix External ROM access timeouts To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Geert Uytterhoeven , Mathias Nyman , Vinod Koul , stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org References: <20250727154516.11599-1-marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org> <2025072828-suspect-work-12ca@gregkh> Content-Language: en-US From: Marek Vasut In-Reply-To: <2025072828-suspect-work-12ca@gregkh> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MBO-RS-ID: 2895dcc8d9f35d888df X-MBO-RS-META: z4ewuoofthbnxkithag6fcpqd37pqwgz On 7/28/25 6:18 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: [...] >> Fixes: 2478be82de44 ("usb: renesas-xhci: Add ROM loader for uPD720201") >> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut >> --- >> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven >> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman >> Cc: Mathias Nyman >> Cc: Vinod Koul >> Cc: [...] > - You have marked a patch with a "Fixes:" tag for a commit that is in an > older released kernel, yet you do not have a cc: stable line in the > signed-off-by area at all, which means that the patch will not be > applied to any older kernel releases. To properly fix this, please > follow the documented rules in the > Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst file for how to resolve > this. Maybe the bot should take into consideration Cc: stable below the --- too ? Or is that considered invalid ? -- Best regards, Marek Vasut