public inbox for linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org
To: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 215740] kernel warning: DMA-API: xhci_hcd: cacheline tracking EEXIST, overlapping mappings aren't supported
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 19:38:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-215740-208809-ezFKorXPdR@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-215740-208809@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215740

--- Comment #47 from Guenter Roeck (linux@roeck-us.net) ---
I (and Google, for that matter) long since went beyond that after the above
feedback ("Equally important, however, is the question of why the people
experiencing this problem turned on CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG in the first place.
That setting is meant only for kernel testing and it drastically reduces
performance.").

For context, we don't enable CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG in production images. We
enable it in test images to catch problems which are only caught in debug
images. Getting false positives in such images doesn't help and hides real
problems.

So we gave up trying to fix the problem in the upstream kernel and implemented
a (downstream) workaround which excludes the "hub" and "xhcd_hcd" drivers from
DMA cacheline tracking. That may not be perfect, but it does the trick for us.

-- 
You may reply to this email to add a comment.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-01-22 19:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-24 15:18 [Bug 215740] New: kernel warning: DMA-API: xhci_hcd: cacheline tracking EEXIST, overlapping mappings aren't supported bugzilla-daemon
2022-03-31  6:52 ` [Bug 215740] " bugzilla-daemon
2022-03-31  6:54 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-03-31  7:41 ` [Bug 215740] New: " Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-04-05  5:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-31  7:41 ` [Bug 215740] " bugzilla-daemon
2022-03-31  7:54 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-04-05  5:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-05-04  8:10 ` bugzilla-daemon
2022-05-04 10:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-10-10 20:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-12 20:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-13 22:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-14  3:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-15 20:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-16  2:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-17 22:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-19 16:47 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-19 21:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-20 19:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-21 19:31 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-21 20:51 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-23 21:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-24 12:02 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-24 12:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-24 15:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-24 15:30 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-24 15:40 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-24 15:50 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-24 16:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-24 16:21 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-24 21:05 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-24 22:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-25  2:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-25 20:50 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-25 21:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-25 22:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-28 19:04 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-28 21:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-29 15:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2023-11-30 19:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-09-24 16:50 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-09-24 16:56 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-06-03  4:08 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-06-03 14:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-06-03 18:31 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-06-03 19:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-01-22  4:53 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-01-22  7:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-01-22 19:38 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2026-03-17 14:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-03-17 16:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-03-17 17:51 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-03-26 19:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-03-27  0:04 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-03-27  7:32 ` bugzilla-daemon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-215740-208809-ezFKorXPdR@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
    --to=bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox