public inbox for linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org
To: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 220272] Latent race condition in USB code unveiled with optimized memset_64.S
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 09:17:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-220272-208809-eGzkxyY5Jm@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-220272-208809@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220272

--- Comment #17 from Michał Pecio (michal.pecio@gmail.com) ---
I also had a look at this LLM generated "report" and I can't see how the
alleged issues are supposed to be real.

1. Replacing wmb() with dma_wmb() possibly makes sense, though on x86 wmb() is
stronger than dma_wmb() so it can't be the cause of your problem. Other PCI
drivers made such change for performance rather than correctness.

2. I'm not familiar with xhci->mutex use so no comment, but the alleged
deadlock probably doesn't exist as there is no asynchronous completion callback
here.

3. Pedantry with no functional impact.

4. The driver will abort a hanging command and signal the completion.

5. We immediately return so we don't go to the out label. No bug.

6. mutex != spinlock. No bug.

7. I see no bug. No static analyzer was run so that part is made up.

8. Doesn't matter if the value is zero.

9. No arithmetic is done on this variable.

-- 
You may reply to this email to add a comment.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-30  9:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-26 11:39 [Bug 220272] New: Latent race condition in USB code unveiled with optimized memset_64.S bugzilla-daemon
2025-06-26 14:04 ` Greg KH
2025-06-26 14:05 ` [Bug 220272] " bugzilla-daemon
2025-06-26 14:30 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-06-26 16:02 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-06-26 16:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-06-26 16:51 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-06-26 16:53 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-06-27  8:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-06-27  9:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-06-27 15:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-06-27 16:08 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-06-27 17:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-06-28  7:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-06-28 16:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-06-28 17:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-06-29 14:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-06-30  8:57 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-06-30  9:17 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2025-06-30 14:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-06-30 14:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-06-30 16:51 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-06-30 18:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-06-30 19:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-07-01 17:50 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-07-02  5:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-07-02  6:02 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-07-02  8:06 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-07-02 14:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-07-02 17:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-07-02 17:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-07-10 20:46 ` bugzilla-daemon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-220272-208809-eGzkxyY5Jm@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
    --to=bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox