From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org
To: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 220491] usb_storage connected SD card disconnects/reconnects on resume from suspend
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2025 00:59:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-220491-208809-jftovUgFSn@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-220491-208809@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220491
--- Comment #34 from Paul Ausbeck (paula@alumni.cse.ucsc.edu) ---
Alan: It may be that the usbmon trace associated with comment #9 is not what I
thought it was. Since I can't readily interpret these traces I can't verify
that they contain what I think they contain. I may have made a mistake.
When I say that a device disconnects/reconnects I get this information from the
dmesg log. I did my best to match the usbmon trace to a proper dmesg log but I
may have made a mistake. I want to emphasize that every time the device
disconnects/reconnects as far as the dmesg log is concerned, the USB filesystem
is unmounted. Every time that the device merely resets and does not
disconnect/reconnect the USB filesystem remains mounted.
Here is a log snippet where the device, 3-4, disconnects/reconnects:
[22784.760311] usb 3-4: USB disconnect, device number 3
[22784.761239] pci_bus 0000:01: Allocating resources
[22784.761855] pci_bus 0000:01: Allocating resources
[22784.762047] done.
[22784.762056] random: crng reseeded on system resumption
[22784.876977] PM: suspend exit
[22784.878740] usb 2-4: new full-speed USB device number 15 using xhci_hcd
[22785.031677] usb 2-4: New USB device found, idVendor=0cf3, idProduct=e300,
bcdDevice= 0.01
[22785.031687] usb 2-4: New USB device strings: Mfr=0, Product=0,
SerialNumber=0
[22785.036360] usb 2-4: USB disconnect, device number 15
[22785.214926] usb 3-4: new SuperSpeed USB device number 4 using xhci_hcd
Here is what a reset with no disconnect/reconnect looks like:
[ 58.003736] usb 3-4: reset SuperSpeed USB device number 2 using xhci_hcd
If the device is always disconnecting/reconnecting at the usbmon level, this is
not always being propagated up to the usbcore level. To the extent that is
true, the usb_persist mechanism is already working at least part of the time.
If usb_persist is already working part of the time that should make it easier
to get it to work all the time.
Just to verify that I did not make a mistake on comment #9, I'll attach another
usbmon trace where there is no disconnect/reconnect at the usbcore level. The
trace that I'm attaching has Bi/Bo:3:002 in every line. I interpret this as
meaning that the host is only talking to the USB storage device. When a
disconnect/reconnect occurs I also see usbmon lines that contain Bi/Bo:3:001,
which I interpret as talking to the associated hub, and Bi/Bo:3:003 which I
interpret as talking to the reincarnated device through a new device ID.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-04 0:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-26 3:34 [Bug 220491] New: usb_storage connected SD card disconnects/reconnects on resume from suspend bugzilla-daemon
2025-08-26 3:38 ` [Bug 220491] " bugzilla-daemon
2025-08-26 10:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-08-26 15:05 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-08-26 16:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-08-26 17:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-08-27 1:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-08-27 3:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-08-27 8:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-08-27 16:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-08-27 16:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-08-27 17:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-08-28 2:47 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-08-28 17:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-08-28 18:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-08-29 17:37 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-08-29 18:31 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-02 21:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-02 21:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-02 21:45 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-03 2:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-03 5:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-03 6:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-03 12:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-03 14:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-03 15:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-03 16:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-03 16:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-03 17:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-03 19:00 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-03 21:04 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-03 21:08 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-03 21:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-03 21:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-04 0:59 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2025-09-04 1:00 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-04 1:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-04 2:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-04 5:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-04 6:05 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-04 15:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-04 23:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-05 1:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-05 11:53 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-05 18:30 ` bugzilla-daemon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-220491-208809-jftovUgFSn@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
--to=bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).