From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org
To: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 220491] usb_storage connected SD card disconnects/reconnects on resume from suspend
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2025 21:45:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-220491-208809-prxwv4E3lq@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-220491-208809@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220491
--- Comment #19 from Paul Ausbeck (paula@alumni.cse.ucsc.edu) ---
I have a couple of AAEON emb-qm77 Intel ivy bridge motherboards, ivy bridge
being the first Intel chipset generation to natively support USB 3.0. Both of
these machines exhibit the same or a similarly situated problem as previously
reported for my Samsung ativ9, Intel broadwell, laptop, that is USB connected
storage devices do not usefully survive suspend/resume cycles. Because emb-qm77
connected USB 3.0 storage devices, usb_storage and/or uas, reliably
disconnect/reconnect on every suspend/resume, I feel like the emb-qm77 MB is a
better representative of the class of machines exhibiting this problem than the
Samsung ativ9 where the problem only sporadically occurs.
For me personally, machines of the ivy bridge to broadwell era are still
eminently useful and would be even more useful if I could patch around this USB
3.0 storage device issue. Though the fault of these now longstanding problems
could more accurately be ascribed to MB BIOS and/or device firmware failings, I
feel like it may be easier and more general to patch around these problems at
the OS kernel level rather than through individual BIOS or firmware patches. In
particular, it seems conceptually desirable to extend the linux kernel's
usb_persist mechanism to encompass disconnection and reconnection of USB 3.0
devices.
Before I pursue this idea further I would like to ask: Does anyone else think
that this would be a useful or even possible concept?
If anyone is interested, I have previously attached usbmon, xhci_hcd, and
usbcore traces of a emb-qm77 suspend resume cycle that encompass a connected
USB 3.0 storage device.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-02 21:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-26 3:34 [Bug 220491] New: usb_storage connected SD card disconnects/reconnects on resume from suspend bugzilla-daemon
2025-08-26 3:38 ` [Bug 220491] " bugzilla-daemon
2025-08-26 10:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-08-26 15:05 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-08-26 16:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-08-26 17:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-08-27 1:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-08-27 3:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-08-27 8:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-08-27 16:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-08-27 16:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-08-27 17:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-08-28 2:47 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-08-28 17:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-08-28 18:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-08-29 17:37 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-08-29 18:31 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-02 21:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-02 21:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-02 21:45 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2025-09-03 2:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-03 5:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-03 6:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-03 12:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-03 14:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-03 15:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-03 16:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-03 16:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-03 17:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-03 19:00 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-03 21:04 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-03 21:08 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-03 21:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-03 21:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-04 0:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-04 1:00 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-04 1:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-04 2:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-04 5:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-04 6:05 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-04 15:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-04 23:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-05 1:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-05 11:53 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-05 18:30 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-05 21:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-08 13:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-08 22:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-08 23:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-08 23:04 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-09 4:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-09 16:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-09 21:05 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-09 21:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-09-09 22:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-220491-208809-prxwv4E3lq@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
--to=bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).