From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org
To: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 220748] usb: xhci_queue_isoc_tx_prepare ignore start_frame and always assumes URB_ISO_ASAP is set
Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2025 10:33:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-220748-208809-rLQqknZiaE@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-220748-208809@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220748
--- Comment #14 from Michał Pecio (michal.pecio@gmail.com) ---
I skimmed the linked forum thread and it seems the issue is not so much with
"needing a specific frame interval", but not tolerating any missing packets.
https://linuxmusicians.com/viewtopic.php?p=177688#p177688
So no-gaps scheduling is already the default *without* URB_ISO_ASAP and drivers
don't need to fill sequential frame IDs themselves if that's what they want.
Note that this stops working when the queue underruns - next URB is assumed to
be a new stream and will be scheduled into the future, not into the past.
If there are gaps despite the driver resubmitting on time, that may be a bug,
but a different one than originally assumed.
If drivers want to insert a gap to resynchronize after detected lost packets,
I'm afraid that's not supported in the current model. It would be technically
possible on CFC xHCI hosts and likely EHCI. A concern is how drivers would know
when frame ID overflows back to zero and how much into the future they can
schedule.
The urb->start_frame field is now output, so drivers can use it to confirm if
the URBs are scheduled sequentially as intended. At least with CFC, it appears
that these numbers should be consistent with reality, though I have never
tested it. Debugfs/tracing/printk may be used to check them against TRBs
written to the HW.
Non-CFC looks weird, maybe it could be improved somewhat but not sure. The old
xHCI 1.0 spec is limited in what it guarantees.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-08 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-04 21:25 [Bug 220748] New: usb: xhci_queue_isoc_tx_prepare ignore start_frame and always assumes URB_ISO_ASAP is set bugzilla-daemon
2025-11-05 8:40 ` [Bug 220748] " bugzilla-daemon
2025-11-05 8:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-11-05 8:53 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-11-05 9:06 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-11-05 15:47 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-11-05 18:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-11-05 18:30 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-11-05 20:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-11-05 21:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-11-06 3:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-11-06 8:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-11-06 8:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-11-06 15:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-11-08 10:33 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2025-11-08 16:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-11-10 10:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-11-10 10:42 ` bugzilla-daemon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-220748-208809-rLQqknZiaE@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
--to=bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).