From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5424CC433E1 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 17:18:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E1D922B4E for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 17:18:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=elloe.vision header.i=@elloe.vision header.b="yWinw9tW" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728827AbgGTRSv (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jul 2020 13:18:51 -0400 Received: from yes.iam.tj ([109.74.197.121]:37664 "EHLO iam.tj" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728324AbgGTRSv (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jul 2020 13:18:51 -0400 Received: from [10.0.40.34] (unknown [51.155.44.233]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by iam.tj (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2D6F1340AD; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 18:18:49 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elloe.vision; s=2019; t=1595265529; bh=xY4C6LY/7UCNXipn4aaYMV8JyOTlb7TTMtY1Ddxk7QU=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=yWinw9tW1WaSE23AJcbrsLEdAa7p/4fC86oIAV+gwye1vnKFHaXY/SMEIa6GDhriW g9nKXbRITBLQqDSddFEHV+2huuOmC4wDiJ6c/lWpK831kveYLiJ6iLsscXftNIJLEI XIiJQ50S/ItIPcr2fdDcjbS8HVggDELpGLFiaYYTdrOwfPrEy+qFyZQI0QsozhlM+w k3OGz272KJFPISRX0TvbsLkXECsAzr6rw2LxFJL/ropaN7vCXcsZY2P882yhyKymRr L5WkR0LoThrokH7B+5Bu36Nr7rw9uKI2FHBHSOlEuQIkHIRaZIK8eUqwN/iTVpT8c4 8XC2TwxKfXSYA== Subject: Re: uas: bug: [sda] tag#21 uas_eh_abort_handler 0 uas-tag 6 inflight: IN To: Oliver Neukum Cc: Greg KH , linux-usb References: <9268a7b4-217e-e76d-af9a-9c5b4f6fe54a@elloe.vision> <20200719110901.GE266150@kroah.com> <1595235102.2531.7.camel@suse.de> From: "Tj (Elloe Linux)" Organization: Elloe CIC Message-ID: Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 18:18:47 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1595235102.2531.7.camel@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-usb-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org On 20/07/2020 09:51, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 19.07.2020, 12:55 +0100 schrieb Tj (Elloe Linux): >> On 19/07/2020 12:09, Greg KH wrote: >>> On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 11:22:10AM +0100, Tj (Elloe Linux) wrote: > >>> Where is an error here? Those looks ok to me. >> >> These repeated 'zaps' and resets every 30 seconds or so are not errors? > > They are errors. But whose errors? 0x28 looks like a READ10 to me. Update for today: setting a quirk to not use UAS allows the device to work without any apparent failures. usb-storage.quirks=0x152d:0x0562:u I plan on capturing a USB debug log with and without the quirk tomorrow.