Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add support for Battery Status & Battery Caps AMS in TCPM

[Amit Sunil Dhamne <amitsd@google.com>]

On 4/3/25 1:02 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 03/04/2025 10:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>>> Which upstream DTS (or upstream supported hardware) is going to use this
>>>>>> binding, so I can see how you are going to implement it there in the
>>>>>> entire system?
>>>>> This is for maxim,max33359 Type-C controller.
>>>> Stop deflecting the questions. max33359 is not a board. I already asked
>>>> two times.
>>>>
>>>> Apparently admitting "no upstream users" is impossible, so let's state
>>>> the obvious:
>>>>
>>>> There are no upstream users of this.
>>> max33359 controller has an upstream user i.e., gs101-oriole (Pixel 6)
>>> board. Totally agree that at the moment there are no upstream
>>> devices/drivers for the Fuel Gauge (that my patchset has a dependency
>>> on) in gs101-oriole board. gs101-oriole uses max77759 fuel gauge device.
>>> I see that there's an effort for upstreaming it
>>> (https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250102-b4-gs101_max77759_fg-v2-0-87959abeb7ff@uclouvain.be/).
>>> I will mark my patches as dependent on it + demonstrate the relationship
>>> of the devices in the gs101-oriole board. Hope that's okay?
>> Then please send the DTS for GS101 Oriole using this binding. I don't
>> understand the point of adding binding for some user and in the same
>> time not doing anything for that user.
>
> ... and just a reminder: DTS goes to separate patchset (!) from USB
> drivers one, with lore link in changelog or cover letter to the binding.

Sure thing!

Thanks

>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof