From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
To: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.com>, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: core: warn if a GFP zone flag is passed to hcd_buffer_alloc()
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 10:45:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e23e72d7-e50b-4a16-b47d-5dcd7cf49641@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250416094807.2545efd8@mordecai>
On 16.04.25 09:48, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> Oh, I do, and that's precisely why these GFP flags are no good. The
> address (and other) constraints imposed by different buses may not
> (and often do not) match any existing memory zone.
True. So we currently have a non-portable series of flags.
It would we better if we passed a hypothetical 'struct mem_constraint*'.
But we don't for now.
> However, zone address ranges are determined statically at compile time,
> or latest at boot time (e.g. arm64). It's too late to adjust the limits
> when you hotplug a more constrained bus at run-time. And I haven't even
> mentioned bus bridges which add a non-zero offset to the address...
Yes. Hence the only time somebody would pass a flag like that would be
on very arch specific code. That means that such a developer would be on
his or her own. Hence I'd say the simplest solution is just to do nothing.
Regards
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-16 8:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-20 15:47 [PATCH] usb: core: do not allocate buffers from a DMA zone unnecessarily Petr Tesarik
2025-03-25 13:40 ` [PATCH v2] usb: core: warn if a GFP zone flag is passed to hcd_buffer_alloc() Petr Tesarik
2025-03-25 13:54 ` Petr Tesarik
2025-04-09 15:40 ` Petr Tesařík
2025-04-10 6:10 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-04-11 13:57 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-04-14 7:02 ` Petr Tesarik
2025-04-14 7:12 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-04-14 7:57 ` Petr Tesarik
2025-04-15 7:53 ` Oliver Neukum
2025-04-16 7:48 ` Petr Tesarik
2025-04-16 8:45 ` Oliver Neukum [this message]
2025-04-16 10:47 ` Petr Tesarik
2025-04-16 13:08 ` Oliver Neukum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e23e72d7-e50b-4a16-b47d-5dcd7cf49641@suse.com \
--to=oneukum@suse.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ptesarik@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox