From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 139083191C8; Mon, 1 Jun 2026 11:12:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780312368; cv=none; b=dmg9Ox/77Y6FaCLYvtevlu6ByptrxSGxab1TaocyTL4H61ZcaqwJ4QAYYuEKnRyumVNP9nLk5/PubXA/B6twWxZxWRNGslqRh9Cw0ADd1sT0/9/SyUe+nwyILCw1NKeypt6yxKoMdfEn0qA4/FBETyoehga4Fyyzp689ck45ABo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780312368; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aS6HEGadJlmHWKF99CfKJiyf4k3tc0Rr4PCVRz04dl0=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=hEeMYaHlw3R7Dbokj6nfEwd3ZP6hZGFmf7YMaITb7Jurx2C+EYD6rjyzWpdWewOCe4zx3O5M/zQy5mCWFdg07dJ6SrBYZOKJJjYsidCpvbmw8g7k1mHiA0LLz155IIZ8+RBYqCIpGNYfJawpJvAnRdiAXPGCFbQkiCowcKWxAV8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=IsZUqzpN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="IsZUqzpN" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1780312367; x=1811848367; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aS6HEGadJlmHWKF99CfKJiyf4k3tc0Rr4PCVRz04dl0=; b=IsZUqzpN7UatlZoo2ezP3CnvIPLTTA999+GE9IIrX1eLSBGQm5HZk62P nhXC678J718mSkNlxKRTN2xUqRxxc8LnBH7m2LlUDzX0F5UYBlG2J8Qv5 yYWHnckkQw4qQY496RZgFW+6WtP/YwtTmysF3zcN/VdlvhLMgjw/KbMcx ggOTXP+D6t8+Vh9fH9SrLGyDB6sdm4CbuL5nhHFyfiF9qC/UDg7HGRIoH nomzvLuIFEwX9EKD2eESOBCrmDxPk7rqtCDUpMz0v4OL3LSlGCeyR+hKX ErDWRwfkBEngYZdkRD7sYUTwS4s6PAU4Eax/E7k4RyVPdUH2INQZw7+Y0 w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: wMTwrPA9R3mIWDAvsvqbmg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 2qKST0a8Qtinn0RPtXijKw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11803"; a="92542496" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,181,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="92542496" Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by orvoesa104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Jun 2026 04:12:46 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: mgglzSuLRmK173AAl/Xnkw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Eq8isNfNQD6usj3Q1QfUKw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,181,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="243644753" Received: from pgcooper-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.245.245.110]) ([10.245.245.110]) by orviesa009-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Jun 2026 04:12:45 -0700 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2026 14:12:42 +0300 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: xhci: Remove isochronous URB_SHORT_NOT_OK handling To: Michal Pecio , Mathias Nyman , Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Alan Stern , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20260529111151.17375c5d.michal.pecio@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Mathias Nyman In-Reply-To: <20260529111151.17375c5d.michal.pecio@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 5/29/26 12:11, Michal Pecio wrote: > This URB flag was never supposed to have any effect on isoc endpoints. > > No kernel code uses the flag except usb_sg_init(), on non-isoc only. > USBFS can't use it on isoc because proc_do_submiturb() rejects it. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Pecio Added, Thanks -Mathias