Linux USB
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "M. Vefa Bicakci" <m.v.b@runbox.com>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>,
	Valentina Manea <valentina.manea.m@gmail.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	syzkaller@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] usbip: Make the driver's match function specific
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 17:31:33 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e6404ae3-4b4e-f8d4-4c92-a71410e20569@runbox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e64f51b0-db05-e078-af58-b31a0be1e9ca@runbox.com>

On 18/09/2020 12.26, M. Vefa Bicakci wrote:
> On 17/09/2020 18.21, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On 9/17/20 8:41 AM, M. Vefa Bicakci wrote:
>>> Prior to this commit, the USB-IP subsystem's USB device driver match
>>> function used to match all USB devices (by returning true
>>> unconditionally). Unfortunately, this is not correct behaviour and is
>>> likely the root cause of the bug reported by Andrey Konovalov.
>>>
>>> USB-IP should only match USB devices that the user-space asked the kernel
>>> to handle via USB-IP, by writing to the match_busid sysfs file, which is
>>> what this commit aims to achieve. This is done by making the match
>>> function check that the passed in USB device was indeed requested by the
>>> user-space to be handled by USB-IP.

[snipped by Vefa]

>>> Reported-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
>>> Fixes: 7a2f2974f2 ("usbip: Implement a match function to fix usbip")
>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/CAAeHK+zOrHnxjRFs=OE8T=O9208B9HP_oo8RZpyVOZ9AJ54pAA@mail.gmail.com/
>>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.8
>>> Cc: Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>
>>> Cc: Valentina Manea <valentina.manea.m@gmail.com>
>>> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
>>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>>> Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
>>> Cc: <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: M. Vefa Bicakci <m.v.b@runbox.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/usb/usbip/stub_dev.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>>>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/usbip/stub_dev.c b/drivers/usb/usbip/stub_dev.c
>>> index 9d7d642022d1..3d9c8ff6762e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/usb/usbip/stub_dev.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/usbip/stub_dev.c
>>> @@ -463,7 +463,20 @@ static void stub_disconnect(struct usb_device *udev)
>>>   static bool usbip_match(struct usb_device *udev)
>>>   {
>>> -    return true;
>>> +    bool match;
>>> +    struct bus_id_priv *busid_priv;
>>> +    const char *udev_busid = dev_name(&udev->dev);
>>> +
>>> +    busid_priv = get_busid_priv(udev_busid);
>>> +    if (!busid_priv)
>>> +        return false;
>>> +
>>> +    match = (busid_priv->status != STUB_BUSID_REMOV &&
>>> +         busid_priv->status != STUB_BUSID_OTHER);
>>> +
>>> +    put_busid_priv(busid_priv);
>>> +
>>> +    return match;
>>>   }
>>>   #ifdef CONFIG_PM
>>>
>>
>> Did you happen to run the usbip test on this patch? If not, can you
>> please run tools/testing/selftests/drivers/usb/usbip/usbip_test.sh
>> and make sure there are no regressions.
> 
> Ah, this is a very good point! I have been testing the patches on Qubes OS,
> which uses usbip to forward USB devices between VMs. To be honest, I was not
> aware of the self-tests for usbip, and I will run the self-tests prior to
> publishing the next version of the patch series.

Hello Shuah,

I have just cleaned up the patches and run usbip_test.sh with a kernel without
the patches in this series and with a kernel in this series.

I noticed that there is a change in behaviour due to the fact that the new
match function (usbip_match) does not always return true. This causes the
stub device driver's probe() function to not get called at all, as the new
more selective match function will prevent the stub device driver from being
considered as a potential driver for the device under consideration.

All of this results in the following difference in the logs of the usbip_test.sh,
where the expected kernel log message "usbip-host 2-6: 2-6 is not in match_busid table... skip!"
is not printed by a kernel that includes the patches in this series.

--- unpatched_kernel_log.txt  2020-09-18 17:12:10.654000000 +0300
+++ patched_kernel_log.txt  2020-09-18 17:12:10.654000000 +0300
@@ -213,70 +213,69 @@
      |__ Port 1: Dev 2, If 0, Class=Human Interface Device, Driver=usbhid, 480M
  ==============================================================
  modprobe usbip_host - does it work?
  Should see -busid- is not in match_busid table... skip! dmesg
  ==============================================================
-usbip-host 2-6: 2-6 is not in match_busid table... skip!
  ==============================================================

Do you find this change in behaviour unacceptable? If no, I can remove this
test case from usbip_test.sh with the same patch. If yes, then there is a need
for a different solution to resolve the unexpected negative interaction between
Bastien's work on generic/specific USB device driver selection and usbip
functionality.

Thank you,

Vefa

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-18 14:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-16 13:33 USB driver ID matching broken Andrey Konovalov
2020-09-16 14:15 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-09-16 14:39   ` Bastien Nocera
2020-09-16 15:58     ` M. Vefa Bicakci
2020-09-17  9:59       ` [PATCH 1/2] usbcore/driver: Fix specific driver selection M. Vefa Bicakci
2020-09-17  9:59         ` [PATCH 2/2] usbip: Make the driver's match function specific M. Vefa Bicakci
2020-09-17 10:23         ` [PATCH 1/2] usbcore/driver: Fix specific driver selection Bastien Nocera
2020-09-17 10:39           ` M. Vefa Bicakci
2020-09-17 10:49             ` Bastien Nocera
2020-09-17 14:41               ` [PATCH 1/3] " M. Vefa Bicakci
2020-09-17 14:41                 ` [PATCH 2/3] usbcore/driver: Fix incorrect downcast M. Vefa Bicakci
2020-09-17 15:01                   ` Alan Stern
2020-09-18  9:26                     ` M. Vefa Bicakci
2020-09-17 14:41                 ` [PATCH 3/3] usbip: Make the driver's match function specific M. Vefa Bicakci
2020-09-17 15:21                   ` Shuah Khan
2020-09-18  9:26                     ` M. Vefa Bicakci
2020-09-18 14:31                       ` M. Vefa Bicakci [this message]
2020-09-18 15:49                         ` Shuah Khan
2020-09-19 13:54                           ` M. Vefa Bicakci
2020-09-21 17:03                             ` M. Vefa Bicakci
2020-09-18 14:31                 ` [PATCH 1/3] usbcore/driver: Fix specific driver selection M. Vefa Bicakci
2020-09-18 14:52                   ` Alan Stern
2020-09-19 13:52                     ` M. Vefa Bicakci

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e6404ae3-4b4e-f8d4-4c92-a71410e20569@runbox.com \
    --to=m.v.b@runbox.com \
    --cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hadess@hadess.net \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=valentina.manea.m@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox