public inbox for linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yongchao Wu <yongchao.wu@autochips.com>
To: "Peter Chen (CIX)" <peter.chen@kernel.org>,
	Pawel Laszczak <pawell@cadence.com>
Cc: "rogerq@kernel.org" <rogerq@kernel.org>,
	"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: cdns3: gadget: fix request skipping after clearing halt
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:59:02 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e963d293-63cd-4124-9a53-8fc16e44ec72@autochips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ae/qXIT19Z2zWsDs@nchen-desktop>

On 26-04-27 09:01:47, Pawel Laszczak wrote:
 >>
 >>
 >> On 26-04-24 00:06:01, Yongchao Wu wrote:
 >>> According to the cdns3 datasheet, the EPRST (Endpoint Reset) command
 >>> causes the DMA engine to reposition its internal pointer to the next
 >>> Transfer Descriptor (TD) if it was already processing one.
 >>>
 >>> This issue is consistently observed during the ADB identification
 >>> process on macOS hosts, where the host issues a Clear_Halt. Although
 >>> commit 4bf2dd65135a ("usb: cdns3: gadget: toggle cycle bit before
 >>> reset
 >>> endpoint") attempted to avoid DMA advance by toggling the cycle bit,
 >>> trace logs show that on certain hosts like macOS, the DMA pointer
 >>> (EP_TRADDR) still shifts after EPRST:
 >>>
 >>>   cdns3_ctrl_req: Clear Endpoint Feature(Halt ep1out)
 >>>   cdns3_doorbell_epx: ep1out, ep_trbaddr f9c04030  <- Should be 
f9c04000
 >>>   cdns3_gadget_giveback: ep1out: req: ... length: 16384/16384
 >>>
 >>> As shown above, the DMA pointer jumped to index 3 (offset 0x30),
 >>> causing the controller to skip the initial TRBs of the request. This
 >>> leads to data misalignment and ADB protocol hangs on macOS.
 >>
 >> Pawel, Is it a hardware issue? The cycle bit has already been 
toggled before the
 >> endpoint has been reset, why the DMA pointer still advances?
 >
 > Yongchao, could you confirm if the TD consists of three TRBs?
In our case, each TD consists of 4 TRBs.
The DMA pointer appears to advance within the same TD after EPRST.

Each 16KB request is split into 4 TRBs (4KB each):
- TRB0 - TRB2: CHAIN
- TRB3: IOC (last TRB of the TD)

After enqueue, the initial EP_TRADDR points to the first TRB:
   EP_TRADDR = 0xf9c04000 (TRB0)

After Clear_Halt (EPRST), it becomes:
   EP_TRADDR = 0xf9c04030 (TRB3)

Since each TRB is 12 bytes, the offset 0x30 corresponds to 4 TRBs.
This indicates that after EPRST, the DMA pointer skipped the entire
current Request and jumped directly to the start of the next Request
at 0xf9c04030

Below is the relevant trace (trimmed):

// enqueue request (16KB -> 4 TRBs)
cdns3_prepare_trb: dma buf: 0xf7abc000, size: 4096, ctrl: 0x00200415
cdns3_prepare_trb: dma buf: 0xf7abd000, size: 4096, ctrl: 0x00000415
cdns3_prepare_trb: dma buf: 0xf7abe000, size: 4096, ctrl: 0x00000415
cdns3_prepare_trb: dma buf: 0xf7abf000, size: 4096, ctrl: 0x00000425

cdns3_doorbell_epx: ep1out, ep_trbaddr f9c04000

// Clear_Halt
cdns3_ctrl_req: Clear Endpoint Feature(Halt ep1out)
cdns3_doorbell_epx: ep1out, ep_trbaddr f9c04030

This behavior is consistently observed on macOS hosts during
ADB enumeration.

So even though the cycle bit is toggled on the first TRB, the
controller still appears to advance the DMA pointer within the same TD
after EPRST.

Please let me know if you need more detailed logs or a full TRB
ring dump. I'd also appreciate any insight into how the controller
determines the next position after EPRST in this case.

Best regards,
Yongchao

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-28  0:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-23 16:06 [PATCH] usb: cdns3: gadget: fix request skipping after clearing halt Yongchao Wu
2026-04-27  1:22 ` Peter Chen (CIX)
2026-04-27  9:01   ` Pawel Laszczak
2026-04-27 22:59     ` Peter Chen (CIX)
2026-04-27 23:59       ` Yongchao Wu [this message]
2026-04-28  9:58         ` Pawel Laszczak
2026-04-28 14:48           ` Yongchao Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e963d293-63cd-4124-9a53-8fc16e44ec72@autochips.com \
    --to=yongchao.wu@autochips.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pawell@cadence.com \
    --cc=peter.chen@kernel.org \
    --cc=rogerq@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox