linux-usb.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@auroraos.dev>
To: Michal Pecio <michal.pecio@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	<linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] r8152: simplify loops in generic_ocp_{read,write}()
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 19:00:09 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <eff53efb-9838-418b-ac9d-f592a15ea76a@auroraos.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260822230326.5d642593.michal.pecio@gmail.com>

On 8/23/26 12:03 AM, Michal Pecio wrote:

[...]

>> In generic_ocp_{read,write}(), the *while* loops look very strange:
>> the last iteration is executed differently to the prior ones, doing
>> some useless assignments before *break*. Move the code for the last
>> iteration out of the loop bodies, dropping the pointless statements
>> as well...
>>
>> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with the Svace
>> static analysis tool.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@auroraos.dev>
>>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/usb/r8152.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++-------------------------
>>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
>> index f61686433031..de9738bdce85 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
>> @@ -1431,27 +1431,19 @@ static int generic_ocp_read(struct r8152 *tp, u16 index, u16 size,
>>       if ((u32)index + (u32)size > 0xffff)
>>               return -EPERM;
>>
>> -     while (size) {
>> -             if (size > limit) {
>> -                     ret = get_registers(tp, index, type, limit, data);
>> -                     if (ret < 0)
>> -                             break;
>> -
>> -                     index += limit;
>> -                     data += limit;
>> -                     size -= limit;
>> -             } else {
>> -                     ret = get_registers(tp, index, type, size, data);
>> -                     if (ret < 0)
>> -                             break;
>> +     while (size > limit) {
>> +             ret = get_registers(tp, index, type, limit, data);
>> +             if (ret < 0)
>> +                     goto error1;
>>
>> -                     index += size;
>> -                     data += size;
>> -                     size = 0;
>> -                     break;
>> -             }
>> +             index += limit;
>> +             data += limit;
>> +             size -= limit;
>>       }
>>
>> +     ret = get_registers(tp, index, type, size, data);
>> +
>> +error1:
>>       if (ret == -ENODEV)
>>               rtl_set_unplug(tp);
> 
> Looks like it could be shorter still.
> 
> s/limit/chunk/
> 
> while (size) {
>         if (size < chunk)
>                 chunk = size;
>         ret = get_registers(tp, index, type, chunk, data);
>         if (ret < 0)
>                 break;
>         index += chunk;
>         data += chunk;
>         size -= chunk;
> }

   That's definitely better, thank you! :-)
   I'll rewrite the patch along these lines, mentioning you in the
Suggested-by tag...

> Then it could be do-while, because we know size > 0, though
> I suppose compilers may figure it out themselves anyway.

   I'd prefer to leave handling of !size as it is now, so I'll
keep using the *while* loop...

> Regards,
> Michal

MBR, Sergey


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-24 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-22 20:21 [PATCH] r8152: simplify loops in generic_ocp_{read,write}() Sergey Shtylyov
2026-08-22 20:26 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2026-08-22 20:58   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-23  8:37     ` Sergey Shtylyov
2026-08-24 17:59       ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-22 21:03 ` Michal Pecio
2026-08-23  8:16   ` David Laight
2026-08-24 16:00   ` Sergey Shtylyov [this message]
2026-08-23  7:52 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2026-08-23  8:11   ` David Laight
2026-08-23  8:20     ` Sergey Shtylyov
2026-08-23  9:51       ` David Laight
2026-08-23 18:00         ` Sergey Shtylyov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=eff53efb-9838-418b-ac9d-f592a15ea76a@auroraos.dev \
    --to=s.shtylyov@auroraos.dev \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.pecio@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).