From: Krishna Kurapati PSSNV <quic_kriskura@quicinc.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@toradex.com>,
Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@google.com>,
Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik@pengutronix.de>,
Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@gmail.com>,
<linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<quic_ppratap@quicinc.com>, <quic_wcheng@quicinc.com>,
<quic_jackp@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] usb: gadget: udc: Handle gadget_connect failure during bind operation
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 01:54:34 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f2bd7593-eff9-46ac-a94b-964eb4787740@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <62083b55-0b78-4ebc-ab78-1c1d99f92507@quicinc.com>
On 9/27/2023 1:36 AM, Krishna Kurapati PSSNV wrote:
>>> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
>>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> static void vbus_event_work(struct work_struct *work)
>>> @@ -1604,12 +1608,23 @@ static int gadget_bind_driver(struct device
>>> *dev)
>>> }
>>> usb_gadget_enable_async_callbacks(udc);
>>> udc->allow_connect = true;
>>> - usb_udc_connect_control_locked(udc);
>>> + ret = usb_udc_connect_control_locked(udc);
>>> + if (ret) {
>>> + mutex_unlock(&udc->connect_lock);
>>> + goto err_connect_control;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> mutex_unlock(&udc->connect_lock);
>>> kobject_uevent(&udc->dev.kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE);
>>> return 0;
>>> + err_connect_control:
>>> + usb_gadget_disable_async_callbacks(udc);
>>> + if (gadget->irq)
>>> + synchronize_irq(gadget->irq);
>>> + usb_gadget_udc_stop_locked(udc);
>>
>> Not good -- usb_gadget_udc_stop_locked() expects you to be holding
>> udc->connect_lock, but you just dropped the lock! Also, you never set
>> udc->allow_connect back to false.
>>
>> You should move the mutex_unlock() call from inside the "if" statement
>> to down here, and add a line for udc->allow_connect.
>>
>
> Hi Alan,
>
> Thanks for the review. Will push v5 addressing the changes.
>
>
Hi Alan,
I tried out the following diff:
- usb_udc_connect_control_locked(udc);
+ ret = usb_udc_connect_control_locked(udc);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err_connect_control;
+
mutex_unlock(&udc->connect_lock);
kobject_uevent(&udc->dev.kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE);
return 0;
+ err_connect_control:
+ udc->allow_connect = false;
+ usb_gadget_disable_async_callbacks(udc);
+ if (gadget->irq)
+ synchronize_irq(gadget->irq);
+ usb_gadget_udc_stop_locked(udc);
+ mutex_unlock(&udc->connect_lock);
+
If I clear UDC and fail dwc3 soft reset on purpose, I see UDC_store failing:
#echo a600000.usb > /sys/kernel/config/usb_gadget/g1/UDC
[ 127.394087] dwc3 a600000.usb: request 000000003f43f907 was not queued
to ep0out
[ 127.401637] udc a600000.usb: failed to start g1: -110
[ 127.406841] configfs-gadget.g1: probe of gadget.0 failed with error -110
[ 127.413809] UDC core: g1: couldn't find an available UDC or it's busy
The same output came when I tested v4 as well. Every time soft_reset
would fail when I try to write to UDC, UDC_store fails and above log
will come up. Can you help confirm if the diff above is proper as I
don't see any diff in the logs in v4 and about to push v5.
Regards,
Krishna,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-26 20:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-26 19:37 [PATCH v4] usb: gadget: udc: Handle gadget_connect failure during bind operation Krishna Kurapati
2023-09-26 19:54 ` Alan Stern
2023-09-26 20:06 ` Krishna Kurapati PSSNV
2023-09-26 20:24 ` Krishna Kurapati PSSNV [this message]
2023-09-26 21:24 ` Alan Stern
2023-09-27 7:28 ` Krishna Kurapati PSSNV
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f2bd7593-eff9-46ac-a94b-964eb4787740@quicinc.com \
--to=quic_kriskura@quicinc.com \
--cc=badhri@google.com \
--cc=francesco.dolcini@toradex.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ivan.orlov0322@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.grzeschik@pengutronix.de \
--cc=quic_jackp@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_ppratap@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_wcheng@quicinc.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox