linux-usb.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, lukaszx.szulc@intel.com,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: usb HC busted?
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 14:46:20 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8cfa055-cfd8-db66-a386-72bf904e17cd@linux.intel.com> (raw)

On 19.07.2018 17:57, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> 
>> xhci driver will set up all the endpoints for the new altsetting already in
>> usb_hcd_alloc_bandwidth().
>>
>> New endpoints will be ready and rings running after this. I don't know the exact
>> history behind this, but I assume it is because xhci does all of the steps to
>> drop/add, disable/enable endpoints and check bandwidth in a single configure
>> endpoint command, that will return errors if there is not enough bandwidth.
> 
> That's right; Sarah and I spent some time going over this while she was
> working on it.  But it looks like the approach isn't adequate.
> 
>> This command is issued in hcd->driver->check_bandwidth()
>> This means that xhci doesn't really do much in hcd->driver->endpoint_disable or
>> hcd->driver->endpoint_enable
>>
>> It also means that xhci driver assumes rings are empty when
>> hcd->driver->check_bandwidth is called. It will bluntly free dropped rings.
>> If there are URBs left on a endpoint ring that was dropped+added
>> (freed+reallocated) then those URBs will contain pointers to freed ring,
>> causing issues when usb_hcd_flush_endpoint() cancels those URBs.
>>
>> usb_set_interface()
>>     usb_hcd_alloc_bandwidth()
>>       hcd->driver->drop_endpoint()
>>       hcd->driver->add_endpoint() // allocates new rings
>>       hcd->driver->check_bandwidth() // issues configure endpoint command, free rings.
>>     usb_disable_interface(iface, true)
>>       usb_disable_endpoint()
>>         usb_hcd_flush_endpoint() // will access freed ring if URBs found!!
>>         usb_hcd_disable_endpoint()
>>           hcd->driver->endpoint_disable()  // xhci does nothing
>>     usb_enable_interface(iface, true)
>>       usb_enable_endpoint(ep_addrss, true) // not really doing much on xhci side.
>>
>> As first aid I could try to implement checks that make sure the flushed URBs
>> trb pointers really are on the current endpoint ring, and also add some warning
>> if we are we are dropping endpoints with URBs still queued.
>>
>> But we need to fix this properly as well.
>> xhci needs to be more in sync with usb core in usb_set_interface(), currently xhci
>> has the altssetting up and running when usb core hasn't event started flushing endpoints.
> 
> Absolutely.  The core tries to be compatible with host controller
> drivers that either allocate bandwidth as it is requested or else
> allocate bandwidth all at once when an altsetting is installed.
> 
> xhci-hcd falls into the second category.  However, this approach
> requires the bandwidth verification for the new altsetting to be
> performed before the old altsetting has been disabled, and the xHCI
> hardware can't do this.
> 
> We may need to change the core so that the old endpoints are disabled
> before the bandwidth check is done, instead of after.  Of course, this
> leads to an awkward situation if the check fails -- we'd probably have
> to go back and re-install the old altsetting.

That would help xhci a lot.

If we want to avoid the awkward altsetting re-install after bandwidth failure
then adding a extra endpoint flush before checking the bandwidth would already help a lot.

The endpoint disabling can then be remain after bandwidth checking.
Does that work for other host controllers?

-Mathias
---
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

             reply	other threads:[~2018-07-20 11:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-20 11:46 Mathias Nyman [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-07-21 10:55 usb HC busted? Sudip Mukherjee
2018-07-20 14:09 Alan Stern
2018-07-20 12:54 Sudip Mukherjee
2018-07-20 11:10 Mathias Nyman
2018-07-19 17:32 Sudip Mukherjee
2018-07-19 15:42 Mathias Nyman
2018-07-19 14:57 Alan Stern
2018-07-19 11:34 Sudip Mukherjee
2018-07-19 10:59 Mathias Nyman
2018-07-17 17:01 Sudip Mukherjee
2018-07-17 15:59 Sudip Mukherjee
2018-07-17 15:52 Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-07-17 15:10 Sudip Mukherjee
2018-07-17 15:08 Alan Stern
2018-07-17 14:49 Sudip Mukherjee
2018-07-17 14:40 Sudip Mukherjee
2018-07-17 14:31 Alan Stern
2018-07-17 14:28 Alan Stern
2018-07-17 13:53 Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-07-17 13:20 Sudip Mukherjee
2018-07-17 12:04 Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-07-17 11:41 Sudip Mukherjee
2018-06-30 21:07 Sudip Mukherjee
2018-06-29 11:41 Mathias Nyman
2018-06-27 12:20 Sudip Mukherjee
2018-06-27 11:59 Sudip Mukherjee
2018-06-25 16:15 Sudip Mukherjee
2018-06-21 11:01 Mathias Nyman
2018-06-21  0:53 Sudip Mukherjee
2018-06-08  9:07 Sudip Mukherjee
2018-06-07  7:40 Mathias Nyman
2018-06-06 16:45 Sudip Mukherjee
2018-06-06 16:42 Sudip Mukherjee
2018-06-06 15:36 Andy Shevchenko
2018-06-06 14:12 Mathias Nyman
2018-06-04 15:28 Sudip Mukherjee
2018-06-03 19:37 Sudip Mukherjee
2018-05-24 13:35 Mathias Nyman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f8cfa055-cfd8-db66-a386-72bf904e17cd@linux.intel.com \
    --to=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukaszx.szulc@intel.com \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).