linux-usb.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Hongyu Xie" <xiehongyu1@kylinos.cn>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: storage: bound timeout=0 URB waits to 30s
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 09:55:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-171104@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261014093856.415812-1-xiehongyu1@kylinos.cn>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] usb-storage: hardcoded 30s URB timeout breaks long-running SCSI commands
--

commit e1a1498b59035fae65ddf1b4b34a943e9c28791c
Author: Hongyu Xie <xiehongyu1@kylinos.cn>

usb: storage: bound timeout=0 URB waits to 30s

This commit bounds timeout=0 URB waits in usb_stor_msg_common() to 30 seconds
to prevent permanent hangs when a device stops responding mid-transfer. It
replaces MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT with a 30-second timeout, matching the SCSI
layer's default command timeout for disk and CD-ROM LUs.

> diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/transport.c b/drivers/usb/storage/transport.c
> index 8de3015bce050..a6588e55312c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/storage/transport.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/storage/transport.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -164,7 +173,7 @@ static int usb_stor_msg_common(struct us_data *us, int timeout)
>   
>  	/* wait for the completion of the URB */
>  	timeleft = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(
> -			&urb_done, timeout ? : MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
> +			&urb_done, timeout ? : USB_STOR_URB_TIMEOUT);

[Severity: High]
Does this hardcoded 30-second timeout break legitimate long-running SCSI
commands like FORMAT UNIT or tape rewinds?

This logic unconditionally truncates unbounded transport waits to 30 seconds,
ignoring dynamic timeouts present in us->srb->request->timeout. A BOT SCSI
command taking longer than 30 seconds could legitimately withhold the CSW
until the operation finishes.

Could this cause usb_stor_msg_common() to kill the URB and return
USB_STOR_XFER_ERROR before the SCSI layer's own command timeout (which could
be hours) expires?

>   
>  	clear_bit(US_FLIDX_URB_ACTIVE, &us->dflags);
>

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261014093856.415812-1-xiehongyu1@kylinos.cn?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-14  9:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-14  9:38 [PATCH] usb: storage: bound timeout=0 URB waits to 30s Hongyu Xie
2026-10-14  9:55 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-14 11:47 ` Greg KH
2026-10-14 14:44 ` [usb-storage] " Alan Stern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-171104@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=xiehongyu1@kylinos.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).