From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CE7C47DF89 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2026 19:17:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792005435; cv=none; b=ZF2nSklSS25q23eD4YN7oHVt+Y6EE5o/6sMo20epIia/bKiPrtQC5zR+oM/MCTCS+q3K3XiELfMdTZkoal8n/ZhlmVrL1/M8Hszoq3I3TtNq+VZh3eWNf3iAC/V6B3j7NXUcUSyVqTs8gfG+voiQSz2zle0Aqt7UYaPR4Ttb/B8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792005435; c=relaxed/simple; bh=j+GOvUG8Yi/ilpU8YGpIL4TMg1i4LhSya2RcN2L6A10=; h=Message-ID:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type: Date; b=cbGJc+B03uVSXqRU4Z9ZX9YZsDXMxE3ra1uoiS9Nr4U0Ur55NxjPK7bROqbqTfJ33G9sNDAl8L7pJRTvukqmiZlouclMwTmCdR9gPMqCpw/Ig7TNy1eQVStkzQIoRso+OG/nf3wToB3ZpNbsc0P48H6RPb+1TDSFsDZUHAy6QuE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=kvNe/7CE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="kvNe/7CE" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CC5C71F000C4; Wed, 14 Oct 2026 19:17:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792005433; bh=j+GOvUG8Yi/ilpU8YGpIL4TMg1i4LhSya2RcN2L6A10=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=kvNe/7CEgh3C1i/AIgZJQQDm4vkcWxJsolR9P/ZcJEX/rMvX2tykos6AdyMnrDQy2 wlThUYZkSEs/Cdd0H+UdK4FsRTdgDnuLrW5IdWysERAvNJSgtjITFEMmY2G+t0xbuC Y9olvDPC5Wakv33tCd2b+oL5j5HsUn0cqBpplHhQrWFcNQbenwp4Z1pYmYnz1kG/TM KvjBgC5LS3dBxq8jFZqCHssrwFiOdEBwt++JKzC3zZSFDvgFKbcQ4JyyG/+sBhx9QU b85pIPSWai30vYJ7gzWSTYniXsLS3usgBDKwlVnJtJ2fGR0+Z4Arj/tdsD41rkcVGk B7nRp1JQxEsqg== Message-ID: From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ACPI: EC: Evaluate _Qxx methods exclusively Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: =?utf-8?b?QWxpIEFobWV0IE1lbWnFnw==?= Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20261014190544.150093-3-aliamemis@disroot.org> References: <20261014190544.150093-1-aliamemis@disroot.org> <20261014190544.150093-3-aliamemis@disroot.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 19:17:12 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > On some Lenovo IdeaPad and Yoga models, _Q0A, _Q0B and the UCSI > notification query _Q16 take the same AML mutex as the battery, UCSI and > ideapad methods. Making those exclusive does not help as long as the > _Qxx methods still run interleaved with them. >=20 > Evaluate _Qxx with acpi_evaluate_object_exclusive(). >=20 > Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221065 > Signed-off-by: Ali Ahmet Memi=C5=9F Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261014190544.1500= 93-1-aliamemis@disroot.org?part=3D2