From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Fedor Gubenkov" <writesfaster@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: usbhid: add HID_QUIRK_SKIP_FEATURE_REPORT_ID
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 10:47:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-172676@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261015102601.1235724-1-writesfaster@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] HID: missing HID_QUIRK_SKIP_FEATURE_REPORT_ID check in usbhid_get_raw_report
--
commit b5d7d6ff27fe5a08bcc6f67c8ed596cb786d6404
Author: Fedor Gubenkov <writesfaster@gmail.com>
HID: usbhid: add HID_QUIRK_SKIP_FEATURE_REPORT_ID
Some HID dongles implement a stateful challenge/response over HID
feature reports. This patch introduces a quirk to omit the report ID from
the SET_REPORT payload, fixing a stall when interacting with the USBKey dongle.
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c
> --- a/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c
> @@ -914,8 +914,10 @@ static int usbhid_set_raw_report(struct hid_device *hid, unsigned int reportnum,
> int ret, skipped_report_id = 0;
>
> /* Byte 0 is the report number. Report data starts at byte 1.*/
> - if ((rtype == HID_OUTPUT_REPORT) &&
> - (hid->quirks & HID_QUIRK_SKIP_OUTPUT_REPORT_ID))
> + if (((rtype == HID_OUTPUT_REPORT) &&
> + (hid->quirks & HID_QUIRK_SKIP_OUTPUT_REPORT_ID)) ||
> + ((rtype == HID_FEATURE_REPORT) &&
> + (hid->quirks & HID_QUIRK_SKIP_FEATURE_REPORT_ID)))
> buf[0] = 0;
> else
> buf[0] = reportnum;
[Severity: Medium]
Since this quirk is used for a challenge/response over feature reports,
does usbhid_get_raw_report() also need to be updated to handle the response?
If the device omits the report ID in its response, it appears
usbhid_get_raw_report() will not offset the buffer for numbered reports:
drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-core.c:usbhid_get_raw_report() {
/* Byte 0 is the report number. Report data starts at byte 1.*/
buf[0] = report_number;
if (report_number == 0x0) {
/* Offset the return buffer by 1, so that the report ID
will remain in byte 0. */
buf++;
count--;
skipped_report_id = 1;
}
...
}
Will this cause usb_control_msg() to overwrite buf[0] (the report ID) with the
first byte of the device's raw payload, resulting in a misaligned payload for
user-space applications reading these feature reports?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261015102601.1235724-1-writesfaster@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-15 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-15 10:26 [PATCH] HID: usbhid: add HID_QUIRK_SKIP_FEATURE_REPORT_ID Fedor Gubenkov
2026-10-15 10:47 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-15 11:33 ` Fedor Gubenkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-172676@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=writesfaster@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox