From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "YuanZhe Liu" <25031212351@stu.xidian.edu.cn>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: usbfs: Require claiming a hub interface for hub class requests
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2026 05:39:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-198602@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261105053050.5245-1-25031212351@stu.xidian.edu.cn>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] usb: usbfs: check_ctrlrecip() misses USB_RECIP_OTHER hub port requests
--
commit 61392c5f20556392416da3011a10145f341cdb72
Author: YuanZhe Liu <25031212351@stu.xidian.edu.cn>
usb: usbfs: Require claiming a hub interface for hub class requests
This patch updates check_ctrlrecip() in drivers/usb/core/devio.c to require
userspace to claim interface 0 before issuing non-GET device-recipient
control requests to a USB hub. This aims to prevent port state requests such
as SET_FEATURE(PORT_SUSPEND) from racing with USBDEVFS_DISCONNECT_CLAIM.
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/devio.c b/drivers/usb/core/devio.c
> index 101cb94254809..1264afe13f688 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/core/devio.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/devio.c
> @@ -891,6 +891,18 @@ static int check_ctrlrecip(struct usb_dev_state *ps, unsigned int requesttype,
> if (USB_TYPE_VENDOR == (USB_TYPE_MASK & requesttype))
> return 0;
>
> + /*
> + * A hub driver owns the ports and the devices behind them. Letting
> + * userspace change port state behind its back, for example with a
> + * SET_FEATURE(PORT_SUSPEND) request while the hub interface is being
> + * released, is not safe: the request is passed down to the HCD, which
> + * may walk per-device state that is being torn down at the same time.
> + */
> + if (ps->dev->descriptor.bDeviceClass == USB_CLASS_HUB &&
> + (requesttype & USB_DIR_IN) == 0 &&
> + (requesttype & USB_RECIP_MASK) == USB_RECIP_DEVICE)
> + return checkintf(ps, 0);
[Severity: Critical]
Does checking only for USB_RECIP_DEVICE in check_ctrlrecip() miss port-targeted
hub class requests such as SetPortFeature(USB_PORT_FEAT_SUSPEND)?
In include/uapi/linux/usb/ch11.h, hub-wide requests use USB_RT_HUB, whereas
port requests use USB_RT_PORT with recipient USB_RECIP_OTHER:
#define USB_RT_HUB (USB_TYPE_CLASS | USB_RECIP_DEVICE)
#define USB_RT_PORT (USB_TYPE_CLASS | USB_RECIP_OTHER)
And in include/linux/usb/hcd.h, SetPortFeature is defined using USB_RT_PORT:
#define SetPortFeature HUB_CLASS_REQ(USB_DIR_OUT, USB_RT_PORT, USB_REQ_SET_FEATURE)
When userspace submits a SetPortFeature(USB_PORT_FEAT_SUSPEND) control
request via USBDEVFS_CONTROL or USBDEVFS_SUBMITURB to reach
xhci_hub_control() -> xhci_stop_device() in drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c,
(requesttype & USB_RECIP_MASK) is USB_RECIP_OTHER rather than
USB_RECIP_DEVICE. Because the subsequent switch on (requesttype &
USB_RECIP_MASK) in check_ctrlrecip() only handles USB_RECIP_ENDPOINT and
USB_RECIP_INTERFACE, won't USB_RECIP_OTHER requests still bypass checkintf()
and leave the race with USBDEVFS_DISCONNECT_CLAIM open?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261105053050.5245-1-25031212351@stu.xidian.edu.cn?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-05 5:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-26 12:36 [PATCH v2] usb: xhci: Fix use-after-free race in xhci_stop_device() YuanZhe Liu
2026-10-26 12:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-30 6:01 ` YuanZhe Liu
2026-11-03 14:56 ` Mathias Nyman
2026-11-03 16:01 ` [PATCH v3] " YuanZhe Liu
2026-11-03 23:00 ` Michal Pecio
2026-11-04 1:32 ` [PATCH v4] " YuanZhe Liu
2026-11-04 1:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 3:56 ` [PATCH v5] " YuanZhe Liu
2026-11-04 4:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 15:02 ` Alan Stern
2026-11-04 16:59 ` Michal Pecio
2026-11-05 4:54 ` Alan Stern
2026-11-05 7:52 ` Michal Pecio
2026-11-05 15:39 ` Alan Stern
2026-11-04 15:15 ` YuanZhe Liu
2026-11-05 4:28 ` Alan Stern
2026-11-05 5:30 ` [PATCH] usb: usbfs: Require claiming a hub interface for hub class requests YuanZhe Liu
2026-11-05 5:39 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-05 5:43 ` [PATCH v2] " YuanZhe Liu
2026-11-05 6:01 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-198602@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=25031212351@stu.xidian.edu.cn \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox