Re: [PATCH v5] usb: usbfs: Require claiming a hub interface for hub class requests

[sashiko-bot@kernel.org]

> check_ctrlrecip() requires the matching interface to be claimed for
> requests addressed to an interface or an endpoint, but requests
> addressed to the device or to a port are passed through without any
> check.  For a hub that means userspace can send hub class requests
> through usbfs without claiming the hub interface, while the hub driver
> owns the ports.  Port requests use USB_RT_PORT, whose recipient is
> USB_RECIP_OTHER, and SetPortFeature(PORT_SUSPEND) is one of them.
> 
> That is more than a policy question.  The request goes to the HCD, and
> it can run concurrently with userspace releasing the hub interface
> through USBDEVFS_DISCONNECT_CLAIM, which unbinds the hub driver and
> disconnects the devices behind it.  xhci_hcd tracks the device behind
> each port and issues stop endpoint commands for it in its port suspend
> path, and it ended up reading a freed xhci_virt_device.
> 
> Require interface 0 to be claimed for every non-GET request to a hub.
> The hub driver matches devices by device class or by interface class,
> but a hub has a single interface either way, and that is the one the
> driver holds.
> 
> Userspace can no longer change port settings while the hub driver is
> bound.  USBDEVFS_CLAIM_PORT hands over the device behind a port, not the
> port itself, so a request that pokes port state is not safe for a
> claimed port either.  Programs that used to do this have to unbind the
> hub driver first.
> 
> Signed-off-by: YuanZhe Liu <25031212351@stu.xidian.edu.cn>

Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261106091048.4056-1-25031212351@stu.xidian.edu.cn?part=1