From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: hyunjungg <hj351016@gmail.com>, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: pch_udc: drain vbus GPIO works before freeing the device
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2026 06:49:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-202670@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261107063652.3387873-1-hj351016@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Medium] usb: gadget: pch_udc: uncancelled irq_work_fall in
pch_vbus_gpio_free()
It also noticed 1 related pre-existing issue this patch does not
introduce:
- [High] usb: gadget: pch_udc: missing work cancellation in
pch_udc_shutdown() [1]
--
commit 89d87fae917e9ebb35853723c8f26eea53836dd5
Author: Hyunjung Ko <hj351016@gmail.com>
usb: gadget: pch_udc: drain vbus GPIO works before freeing the device
This commit cancels dev->vbus_gpio.irq_work_fall and irq_work_rise after
free_irq() in pch_vbus_gpio_free() to prevent the VBUS GPIO work handlers
from running after dev is freed on device removal.
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/pch_udc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/pch_udc.c
> index 99b3ce28210f9..55310946de292 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/pch_udc.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/pch_udc.c
> @@ -1406,8 +1406,11 @@ static int pch_vbus_gpio_init(struct pch_udc_dev *dev)
> */
> static void pch_vbus_gpio_free(struct pch_udc_dev *dev)
> {
> - if (dev->vbus_gpio.intr)
> + if (dev->vbus_gpio.intr) {
> free_irq(dev->vbus_gpio.intr, dev);
> + cancel_work_sync(&dev->vbus_gpio.irq_work_fall);
> + cancel_work_sync(&dev->vbus_gpio.irq_work_rise);
> + }
> }
>
> /**
[Severity: Medium]
Can dev->vbus_gpio.irq_work_fall still be left running when
dev->vbus_gpio.port is present but dev->vbus_gpio.intr is 0?
pch_vbus_gpio_init() initializes irq_work_fall whenever a VBUS GPIO is
obtained, before gpiod_to_irq() and request_irq() set dev->vbus_gpio.intr:
drivers/usb/gadget/udc/pch_udc.c:pch_vbus_gpio_init() {
...
dev->vbus_gpio.port = gpiod;
INIT_WORK(&dev->vbus_gpio.irq_work_fall, pch_vbus_gpio_work_fall);
irq_num = gpiod_to_irq(gpiod);
...
}
When dev->vbus_gpio.intr is 0, pch_udc_dev_isr() schedules irq_work_fall
on a USB suspend interrupt:
drivers/usb/gadget/udc/pch_udc.c:pch_udc_dev_isr() {
...
} else if ((dev->vbus_session == 0)
&& (vbus == 1)
&& !dev->vbus_gpio.intr)
schedule_work(&dev->vbus_gpio.irq_work_fall);
...
}
If gpiod_to_irq() or request_irq() fails, or if UDC_DEVINT_US fires in
pch_udc_remove() before pch_udc_exit() masks device interrupts,
pch_vbus_gpio_work_fall() can continue polling for up to 3 seconds after
pch_udc_remove() returns and devres frees dev, causing a use-after-free.
[Severity: High]
This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but can a VBUS GPIO
transition during system shutdown re-initialize the controller after
pch_udc_shutdown() [1]?
pch_udc_shutdown() disables UDC interrupts and disconnects the pullup,
but it does not call pch_vbus_gpio_free() or otherwise disable the VBUS
GPIO interrupt and cancel irq_work_fall and irq_work_rise. If either work
runs during shutdown, pch_vbus_gpio_work_fall() or
pch_vbus_gpio_work_rise() can call pch_udc_init() or pch_udc_reconnect(),
resetting the hardware and re-enabling PCI interrupts across reboot or
kexec.
[1] https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-bb1818ac-db9a-4dc2-af47-62b314381f33
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261107063652.3387873-1-hj351016@gmail.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-07 6:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-07 6:36 [PATCH] usb: gadget: pch_udc: drain vbus GPIO works before freeing the device hyunjungg
2026-11-07 6:49 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-202670@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=hj351016@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox