From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Arun Iyengar" <aiyengar1990@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] usb: typec: tcpm: Don't cut a pending state delay short on a re-queue
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 10:52:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-206898@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261110-tcpm-attach-reboot-v1-1-7657cc1e2dca@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found no new issues
in this patch, but noticed 1 related pre-existing issue it does not
introduce:
- [Critical] usb: typec: tcpm: use-after-free in tcpm_unregister_port()
[1]
--
commit fc426c7d09bd548d8d6ca702db9699249b1a96bd
Author: Arun Iyengar <aiyengar1990@gmail.com>
usb: typec: tcpm: Don't cut a pending state delay short on a re-queue
This commit checks whether a pending state transition delay has expired in
tcpm_state_machine_work() and re-arms port->state_machine_timer for the
remaining time if the work item was re-queued early.
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> index d721baef52104..0a19b7665555b 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> @@ -6569,6 +6569,18 @@ static void tcpm_state_machine_work(struct kthread_work *work)
>
> /* If we were queued due to a delayed state change, update it now */
> if (port->delayed_state) {
> + /*
> + * The work may have been queued again for another reason
> + * while it was running, for instance by tcpm_init() at port
> + * registration, which sets two states in a row with the
> + * port lock held. Do not cut a pending delay short; re-arm
> + * the timer for the time that is left.
> + */
> + if (ktime_after(port->delayed_runtime, ktime_get())) {
> + hrtimer_start(&port->state_machine_timer,
> + port->delayed_runtime, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS);
> + goto done;
> + }
[Severity: Critical]
This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but can
state_machine_timer_handler() trigger a use-after-free on port->wq during
tcpm_unregister_port() [1]?
drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c:state_machine_timer_handler() {
if (port->registered)
kthread_queue_work(port->wq, &port->state_machine);
return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
}
drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c:tcpm_unregister_port() {
port->registered = false;
kthread_destroy_worker(port->wq);
port->wq = NULL;
hrtimer_cancel(&port->vdm_discovery_timer);
hrtimer_cancel(&port->enable_frs_timer);
hrtimer_cancel(&port->vdm_state_machine_timer);
hrtimer_cancel(&port->state_machine_timer);
...
}
Because tcpm_unregister_port() destroys port->wq before cancelling the
hrtimers, an expiring timer on another CPU can pass the port->registered
check and queue work onto the freed worker:
CPU0 CPU1
tcpm_unregister_port() state_machine_timer_handler()
if (port->registered)
port->registered = false;
kthread_destroy_worker(port->wq);
kthread_queue_work(port->wq, ...);
<-- use-after-free
hrtimer_cancel(&port->state_machine_timer);
Cancelling the hrtimers after setting port->registered = false and before
calling kthread_destroy_worker(port->wq) would avoid this race.
[1] https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-3223298d-cf35-4f30-825a-9241513c9ba5
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261110-tcpm-attach-reboot-v1-0-7657cc1e2dca@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-10 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-10 10:39 [PATCH 0/3] usb: typec: Find a Type-C partner after a warm reboot on the Orange Pi 5 Arun Iyengar via B4 Relay
2026-11-10 10:39 ` [PATCH 1/3] usb: typec: tcpm: Don't cut a pending state delay short on a re-queue Arun Iyengar via B4 Relay
2026-11-10 10:52 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-10 10:39 ` [PATCH 2/3] usb: typec: fusb302: Toggle with the default Rp current Arun Iyengar via B4 Relay
2026-11-10 10:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 10:39 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: Mark the Orange Pi 5/5B Type-C port self-powered Arun Iyengar via B4 Relay
2026-11-10 10:47 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-206898@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=aiyengar1990@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox