From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Hyunjung Ko" <hj351016@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: lpc32xx_udc: drain the pullup work on removal
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 11:55:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-206965@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261110114351.2524921-1-hj351016@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Medium] usb: gadget: lpc32xx_udc: cancel_work_sync() skips
pullup_work() on remove
It also noticed 1 related pre-existing issue this patch does not
introduce:
- [Medium] usb: gadget: lpc32xx_udc: incorrect work struct scheduled in
udc_handle_dev() [1]
--
commit 4049fdca943c63a00b8c69476b8030baf97607c6
Author: Hyunjung Ko <hj351016@gmail.com>
usb: gadget: lpc32xx_udc: drain the pullup work on removal
This commit cancels udc->pullup_job in lpc32xx_udc_remove() before releasing
the devm-allocated udc and its isp1301 i2c client.
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/lpc32xx_udc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/lpc32xx_udc.c
> index 94355d3d930fd..210fa1f886c8a 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/lpc32xx_udc.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/lpc32xx_udc.c
> @@ -3187,6 +3187,13 @@ static void lpc32xx_udc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> udc_disable(udc);
> pullup(udc, 0);
>
> + /*
> + * pullup() schedules pullup_job to do the slow isp1301 i2c access; the
> + * work dereferences udc, so drain it before the devm-allocated udc (and
> + * the isp1301 i2c client it uses) are released.
> + */
> + cancel_work_sync(&udc->pullup_job);
[Severity: Medium]
Does cancel_work_sync(&udc->pullup_job) skip disabling the ISP1301 D+
pull-up on removal?
pullup(udc, 0) calls isp1301_pullup_enable(udc, 0, 0) with block = 0, which
sets udc->pullup = 0 and queues udc->pullup_job so pullup_work() ->
isp1301_pullup_set() clears OTG1_DP_PULLUP over I2C:
drivers/usb/gadget/udc/lpc32xx_udc.c:isp1301_pullup_enable() {
if (en_pullup == udc->pullup)
return;
udc->pullup = en_pullup;
if (block)
isp1301_pullup_set(udc);
else
/* defer slow i2c pull up setting */
schedule_work(&udc->pullup_job);
}
Canceling udc->pullup_job right after scheduling it prevents pullup_work()
from running if it has not started yet, leaving OTG1_DP_PULLUP asserted in
the transceiver after the UDC is disabled and unbound. Using flush_work()
here would let the queued pull-up disable complete before tearing down udc.
[Severity: Medium]
This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but udc_handle_dev() schedules
udc->pullup_job instead of udc->power_job when handling suspend and resume
events [1]:
drivers/usb/gadget/udc/lpc32xx_udc.c:udc_handle_dev() {
...
/* Power down transceiver */
udc->poweron = 0;
schedule_work(&udc->pullup_job);
uda_resm_susp_event(udc, 1);
}
} else if ((udc->gadget.speed != USB_SPEED_UNKNOWN) &&
udc->driver && udc->vbus) {
uda_resm_susp_event(udc, 0);
/* Power up transceiver */
udc->poweron = 1;
schedule_work(&udc->pullup_job);
}
}
Because pullup_work() ignores udc->poweron and udc->power_job is never
scheduled anywhere else, power_work() never runs and the ISP1301 transceiver
never transitions power states across suspend and resume.
[1] https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-931b6f24-8f05-4e96-9acb-90ce7f88f38f
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261110114351.2524921-1-hj351016@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-10 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-10 11:43 [PATCH] usb: gadget: lpc32xx_udc: drain the pullup work on removal Hyunjung Ko
2026-11-10 11:55 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-10 12:02 ` [PATCH v2] " Hyunjung Ko
2026-11-10 12:16 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-206965@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=hj351016@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox