linux-watchdog.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>
Cc: Takahisa Tanaka <mc74hc00@gmail.com>,
	linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org,
	Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <arekm@maven.pl>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sp5100_tco: Fix wrong indirect I/O access for getting value of reserved bits
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 09:46:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1360140363.4790.7.camel@mattotaupa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130130191945.GA20100@spo001.leaseweb.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1225 bytes --]

Dear Wim,


Am Mittwoch, den 30.01.2013, 20:19 +0100 schrieb Wim Van Sebroeck:

> > In case of SB800 or later chipset and re-programming MMIO address(*),
> > sp5100_tco module may read incorrect value of reserved bit, because the module
> > reads a value from an incorrect I/O address. However, this bug doesn't cause
> > a problem, because when re-programming MMIO address, by chance the module
> > writes zero (this is BIOS's default value) to the low three bits of register.
> > * In most cases, PC with SB8x0 or later chipset doesn't need to re-programming
> >   MMIO address, because such PC can enable AcpiMmio and can use 0xfed80b00 for
> >   watchdog register base address.
> > 
> > This patch fixes this bug.
> > 
> > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43176
> > Signed-off-by: Takahisa Tanaka <mc74hc00@gmail.com>
> 
> Added to linux-watchdog-next.

Is it allowed to rewrite history of linux-watchdog-next? If yes, could
you please add `CC: stable@vger.kernel.org` to both of Takahisa’s
patches and also add my

    Tested-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
        ASRock E350M1 (SB800)

as commented on the bug report to it?


Thanks,

Paul

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2013-02-06  8:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-14  2:01 [PATCH 1/2] sp5100_tco: Fix wrong indirect I/O access for getting value of reserved bits Takahisa Tanaka
2013-01-14  2:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] sp5100_tco: Write back the original value to reserved bits, instead of zero Takahisa Tanaka
2013-01-30 19:20   ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2013-01-31 13:43     ` t t
2013-01-30 19:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] sp5100_tco: Fix wrong indirect I/O access for getting value of reserved bits Wim Van Sebroeck
2013-02-06  8:46   ` Paul Menzel [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1360140363.4790.7.camel@mattotaupa \
    --to=paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arekm@maven.pl \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=florian@mickler.org \
    --cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mc74hc00@gmail.com \
    --cc=wim@iguana.be \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).