From: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>
To: Natarajan Gurumoorthy <natg@google.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com>,
"lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org" <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] Use "request_muxed_region" in it87 watchdog drivers
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 22:58:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110415055852.GA21905@ericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=t+AgRU47DhKoGOJ2mTa6AVfaPVw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:14:32PM -0400, Natarajan Gurumoorthy wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Guenter Roeck
> <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com> wrote:
> > Unless I am missing something, the problem is that there is another driver
> > calling request_region() instead of request_muxed_region().
> >
> > w83697hf_check_wdt() (and other drivers doing the same) should call
> > request_muxed_region(). Otherwise, the same problem could happen with the
> > caller(s) of request_region() - those calls could fail as well.
> > Plus, other callers of request_muxed_reason() not implementing
> > your retry code could end up with the same problem, ie with spurious failures.
> >
> > I think we will have to find a solution which does not require retries
> > when calling request_muxed_region(). On the other side, others know
> > this code much better than I do, so maybe someone has a better solution.
> >
> Guenter,
> Your conclusion is on the money. request_muxed_region will fail if
> someone else called request_region for the same region. The knife cuts
> both ways and reguest_region will fail when a request_muxed_region
> calll has been made for the same zone. I am not sure what happens
> when the second driver calls request_muxed_region for only part of the
> region that has been reserved by another driver. This is of course one
> of the problems. The other problem is that there are drivers which
> don't call either of those 2 interfaces and just go ahead and clobber
> the 0x2e 0x2f zone because they think they own all of it. I created a
> list drivers in hwmon and watchdog directories that need to be fixed
> in one of my earlier emails. John Delvare replied that are other
> drivers in parport that all need fixing. I got started on this because
> we use 2 different it87 drivers (hwmon/it87.c and
> watchdog/it8712f_wdt.c) concurrently and had to solve this problem.
>
I have seen the list. I don't think you should fix everything in one go.
First step might be to get the w83697hf and it87 to work together, then
go from there.
Is there a reason for loading (or trying to load) both the it87 and
the w83697hf driver at the same time ? Those drivers are usually only
loaded if the respective chip is known to exist. If there is no reason
to try loading both drivers, a simple workaround would be to not do it.
Thanks,
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-15 5:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-14 21:36 [PATCH v6 0/2] Make all it87 drivers SMP safe Nat Gurumoorthy
2011-04-14 21:37 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] Use "request_muxed_region" in it87 watchdog drivers Nat Gurumoorthy
2011-04-14 22:49 ` Guenter Roeck
2011-04-15 1:18 ` Natarajan Gurumoorthy
2011-04-15 2:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2011-04-15 3:14 ` Natarajan Gurumoorthy
2011-04-15 5:58 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2011-04-15 8:46 ` Natarajan Gurumoorthy
2011-04-15 11:05 ` Guenter Roeck
2011-04-18 7:33 ` [lm-sensors] " Hans de Goede
2011-04-14 21:38 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] Use "request_muxed_region" in it87 hwmon drivers Nat Gurumoorthy
2011-04-15 21:07 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] Make all it87 drivers SMP safe Jarod Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110415055852.GA21905@ericsson.com \
--to=guenter.roeck@ericsson.com \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=mikew@google.com \
--cc=natg@google.com \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).