From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from ns1.pc-advies.be ([83.149.101.17]:38150 "EHLO spo001.leaseweb.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754114Ab2COV1J (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:27:09 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:27:05 +0100 From: Wim Van Sebroeck To: Linus Walleij Cc: Wolfram Sang , Linus Walleij , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog/coh901327: convert to use watchdog core Message-ID: <20120315212705.GH10698@spo001.leaseweb.com> References: <1331131929-22383-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com> <20120307164240.GA1130@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Linus, > On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Wolfram Sang wr= ote: >=20 > >> =A0 =A0 =A0 case WDIOC_GETTIMELEFT: > >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 clk_enable(clk); > >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 /* Read repeatedly until the value is st= able! */ > > > > I was wondering if it pays to put this IOCTL to watchdog_dev and add = another > > callback to watchdog_ops? I'd think so. Wim, Linus, what do you think= ? >=20 > OK with me, shall I hack a patch? I think Viresh did something allready. Kind regards, Wim. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog"= in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html