From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@men.de>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@altera.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>,
Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>,
Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@gmail.com>,
John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>,
Xianglong Du <Xianglong.Du@csr.com>,
Barry Song <Baohua.Song@csr.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Subject: New watchdog and watchdog-next branches to augment the existing ones
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 10:59:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131002175937.GA4811@roeck-us.net> (raw)
Hi all,
to support Wim in his efforts to maintain the watchdog subsystem,
I created two new branches in my repository at kernel.org
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/groeck/linux-staging.git
The two branches are
watchdog for watchdog patches I believe should be applied
to the current upstream kernel
watchdog-next for patches I believe are ready to be pushed upstream
in the next commit window.
Both branches may and will be rebased from time to time as I see fit. watchdog
will in general be based on a recent upstream tag, and watchdog-next will be
based on watchdog. As of today, the watchdog branch is based on v3.12-rc3.
The new branches are not supposed to replace Wim's repository, but to augment it.
It enables me to run my own automated build tests (see
http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders for current build results), and it will
hopefully trigger builds by Fengguang's build robots with the various patches
applied.
I also set up patchwork to track the watchdog mailing lists at
http://server.roeck-us.net/project/linux-watchdog/list/. This is mostly for
myself to ensure that patches don't get lost, but it is accessible for others
as well.
I hope this will help Wim in deciding if and when to push patches upstream; at
the very least it will provide additional test coverage. Note that I don't plan
to add the watchdog-next branch to linux-next, as the decision if and when
to push patches upstream is up to Wim to make.
Thanks,
Guenter
---
P.s.: If you are on the Cc: list, it is most likely because you signed off
at least one of the patches in one of the branches.
next reply other threads:[~2013-10-02 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-02 17:59 Guenter Roeck [this message]
2013-10-09 6:24 ` New watchdog and watchdog-next branches to augment the existing ones Barry Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131002175937.GA4811@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=Baohua.Song@csr.com \
--cc=Xianglong.Du@csr.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=blogic@openwrt.org \
--cc=dinguyen@altera.com \
--cc=jamie@jamieiles.com \
--cc=johannes.thumshirn@men.de \
--cc=jonas.jensen@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=pavel@denx.de \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).